Home - option4.co.nz The more people we can get involved in these issues the better Fishing in New Zealand
   
SEARCH THIS SITE

 STAY INFORMED
YES I want to be
kept informed
Change existing options


Promote option4

Please help option4

 

 

Wairewa Reserve Submission

Akaroa Harbour (Dan Rogers) Marine Reserve Application

Submission by Wairewa Runanga

13 June 2006

 

Marine Technical Support Officer

Department of Conservation

Private Bag 4715

Christchurch

 

Tënä koe,

Wairewa Rünanga is a Ngai Tahu Papatipu Rünanga as recognised in the First Schedule of the Ngäi Tahu Act 1996. There are approx 9,000 persons who can affiliate to Wairewa Rünanga.

Wairewa Rünanga strenuously objects to the establishment of a Marine Reserve in Dan Rogers.

Pollution and over fishing within certain areas of the Harbour have diminished the areas available within our traditional fishing grounds to gather mahika kai as demonstrated in the evidence provided to the Maori Land Court (MLC) 2003 Taiäpure Hearing.

Akaroa Harbour has “customarily been an area of special significance… as a source of food and for spiritual and cultural reasons” to us as confirmed by the MLC Tribunal 2005 report and recommendations to the Minister of Fisheries.

Further to the evidence supplied to the MLC and the tribunal’s report, we also supply the information that was outlined at the meeting with the Minister of Conservation, June 1st 2006 regarding the loss of our customary fishing along the shoreline of the harbour as outlined by John Panirau and Naomi Bunker.

From about the early 1940’s the people of Wairewa and Önuku (aka The Kaik) combined as one people and fished the harbour together. Since that time also, we have witnessed the loss of the luxury of being able to fish freely and almost with monopoly most of the shoreline of Akaroa harbour.

Sharing the fishing grounds with others is not a problem but losing an established customary fishing ground entirely is another matter. We have taught many a visitor how to ‘drag’ for flounder and show them where to gather mussels and then show them how to cook them.  Together we have enjoyed and shared the resources within the harbour for a long, long time.

We would like to show what has happened to our resource over the years and will start with the western shoreline.

 

Area 1

(pink) on the map below extending from Timutimu Head to Te Kororiwha is a self imposed no fishing area for local Mäori.

This is because of the ‘Ana-koiwi’ (under-water burial caves) along this section of the shoreline.   Until recently we have kept the knowledge to ourselves and we make no attempt to stop others from fishing the area so as to avoid the possibility of our ancestors being deliberately disturbed.   We do not fish this area.

TOP

Area 2

The Wainui area. Was once a good place to gather kütai, kaeo, püpü and paua and also at one time a good fishing ground for Moka (red cod). Köura were sometimes taken in this area as well.

This is where we taught some local farmers how to drag for flounder. A number of holiday homes have sprung up over the years and the shoreline in this area is too readily accessible. Too many people fish the area now. One real concern is that some people have been caught using piano wire to scrape everything from the rocks thus destroying an important part of the food chain.

 

Area 3

Although some parts of this area are still fishable, there is a small ancient urupä near the shoreline and a recent rubbish dump and more recently an under-water sewerage outlet. We will not fish this area now. Out from Mairaki and near Öpukutahi is a rua taniwha in which reside two taniwha (Te wahine-Marukore and her male escort Te Rangi-hora-hina) whose task is to protect all users of the harbour.

Before the time of the rubbish dump and sewer outlet and when we wanted to fish these areas our elders would undergo certain rituals, principally karakia, before allowing us to proceed.  

 

Area 4

Tikao to Te Ruatahi. Huangi, pipi, kina, tuatua and paua were taken from this area at one time.  Sea horses were free to breed at Öpakia at that time but again this area has been frequented by people who use piano wire to strip the rocks bare of all life forms (and take away bucket loads of sea horses). Archaeological evidence has been found of early pre-European Mäori working with whale and shark in the area 4 as marked on the above map.

 

Area 5

Önawe Peninsula. Evidence of the seeding garden can still be seen along the western shoreline of this small peninsula. It provided the old pa site with a ready supply of kaimoana (probably mostly paua) and was perhaps the first ‘sea farm’ of the area.

It is also evident that shell fish didn’t propagate easily without assistance at any time. Önawe southward is protected by sea with an unobstructed view to the Akaroa Heads. It is protected northward by a narrow neck of land connecting it to the mainland, a strip of land so narrow as to allow single file passage only.

East and west are flanked on both sides at low tide by thick sticky mudflats. This area was good for set netting and was well fished, however to sewage and over fishing we rarely fish this area now.

 

Areas 6 – 7 – 8  &  9

From Ihutu to Takamätua. Mostly thick sticky mudflats in the bays. Whitebait in season in the streams flowing seaward and a known set netting area. Over the past 15-20 years the number of holiday homes have trebled and recreational fishing has increased proportionately.

Shellfish do not appear to survive very well in this area and are mostly very, very small kütai. Takamätua used to be the exception producing good-sized kütai at one time. Again, we are reluctant to overfish the area.

 

Area 10

Paka Ariki (Childrens Bay). A bay at the northern most end of Akaroa Township. A good area for pätiki, manga and moka. Also good for kütai and paua. This is where the Akaroa County Council wanted to build a marina and the local Mäori, both Önuku and Wairewa managed to dissuade them. Water skiing and pleasure boats have disturbed the customary flounder fishing in this area.

 

Area 11

Akaroa Township. No kaimoana here. A sewer outlet is in this area as well.

 

Area 12

This is the area near to the Akaroa boat sheds where the first verbal submissions for and/or against a Taiäpure in Akaroa Harbour were held with the Mäori Land Court in session. Immediately alongside and southwards from the boatshed was once a good fishing area for pätiki and manga. Rock-oysters were also abundant. Over the past 15 – 20 years boat moorings for pleasure boats have taken precedence and customary fishing is no longer possible in this area.

 

Area 13

Takapüneke.

An area of important historic significance. An ancient Mäori pä site used by the paramount Ngäi Tahu chief Te Maiharanui until it was sacked by the invader, Te Rauparaha. Near the top of the site and in a narrow gully running down through the pä site the Akaroa County Council established a public rubbish dump and at the base of Takapüneke at the shoreline, the same council built a sewerage plant.

All this without consultation with the hapü of the area. The ancient Maori often built their pä sites close to an abundance of kai. That makes sense. Local hapü cannot and do not fish in this area now that it has been polluted. Close to Takapüneke is the Britomart Monument where an ancestor of the Ngäti Irakehu helped foil the French by assisting the timely raising of the Union Jack.

 

Area 14

This particular area shown by a thick red line on the above map, is steep, hilly and inaccessible land in private ownership. It is not possible to fish except by boat.

 

Area 15

Önuku

This area, Önuku as far as Mänukatahi (the proposed northern boundary of the proposed Marine Reserve) is all that remains of the freedom we once enjoyed in regards to customary fishing if the proposed marine reserve goes ahead. A very, very small percentage of what we once had and what we have been using for generations before colonisation.

 

Area 16

The area of the proposed marine reserve.

The Mäori name for this area – Te Whata o Kökiro - explains more of what it means to Mäori and other fishers than the name ‘Dan Rogers’ could ever do. It is a pantry, a storehouse of kaimoana. Always has been, always will be. Throughout this submission we have mentioned only some of the species that we have gathered traditionally around the shoreline of Akaroa Harbour, there are many more not mentioned such as shark, moki, kina, groper etc.   

In Mäori tradition Te Whata o Kökiro belongs to the people, to be used by the people and to feed the people. We will continue to fight and oppose a marine reserve to achieve this end.

We are a patient people as evidenced by the 14 years of debate, arguing, consultation and submissions that preceded the granting of a Taiäpure in Akaroa Harbour. This Marine Reserve will breach our treaty rights; it will breach our customary rights and will breach the rights of recreational fishers as well. We strongly oppose this concept of a marine reserve in the Dan Rogers area.

 TOP

Peni’s Hat (Not shown on the above map)

Taua Naomi mentioned a particular rock that lies out near the Harbour Heads. It is a black rock shaped very much like a bowler hat. Blue cod, terakihi and shark could be taken at or near this rock and the rock was also used as a navigation marker to the groper fishing grounds. Taua Naomi is 99% sure that the rock lies within the boundaries of the proposed marine reserve.

We also ask that the Minister of Conservation take the following matters into consideration. 

Section 5(6)(e) of the Marine Reserves Act 1971 states that the Minister must uphold an objection (in this case the objection from Wairewa) if the Minister is satisfied that declaring the marine reserve would be contrary to the public interest.

We vehemently state that it is not in the public interest for the Minister to declare a marine reserve and effectively over-ride the taiäpure application (a component of a Treaty settlement provided to make better provision for the recognition of rangatiratanga and of the right secured in relation to fisheries by Article II of the Treaty of Waitangi) that has been made for the same area – especially when the Taiäpure Tribunal of the Mäori Land Court has found that the entire taiäpure application (not just the area that has been gazetted) meets all the statutory tests (i.e.: that the Dan Rogers area is an area of special significance to the Tangata Whenua, as a source of food and for spiritual and cultural reasons).

Section 4 of the Conservation Act 1987 states that the Act (and all the Acts listed in its First Schedule) must be interpreted and administered to give effect to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. Furthermore, section 10(a) of the TOW(FC)SA states that in accordance with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, non-commercial fishing rights continue to give rise to Treaty obligations on the Crown – it could be strongly argued that these obligations apply equally to the Minister of Conservation.

Relevant Treaty principles include:

  • Rangatiratanga – Tängata Whenua exercising their traditional authority over fisheries resources and other taonga in accordance with manawhenua, manamoana. [1] It cannot be extinguished otherwise than by the free consent of the native occupiers. [2] The Crown is bound by the common law to give full recognition to customary rights. [3] The Crown assured them…their existing rights would be guaranteed, not only in terms of possession of their fishing grounds, but in the mana to control them. [4]
  • Kaitiakitanga – Tängata Whenua exercising their customary duty as kaitiaki over fisheries resources. [5]
  • Partnership – A solemn compact between two parties (Tängata Whenua and the Crown). [6] Legitimate acquisition of sovereignty in return for protection of chieftainship and property rights. [7] The Treaty imposed a duty upon the partners to act reasonably and in the utmost good faith. [8] The basic object of the Treaty was that two people would live in one country. [9]
  • Active Protection – Active protection of the taonga of the Tängata Whenua [10] to the fullest extent reasonably practicable [11] including Tängata Whenua fishing rights. [12] Cannot extinguish the rights of Tängata Whenua without their free consent. [13]
  • Protection of the customary rights, aboriginal title and other rights inherent in the rangatiratanga of Ngäi Tahu Whänui [14]
  • Kawanatanga – The Crown should provide laws and make related decisions for the community as a whole. [15]
  • Duty to remedy past breaches – The Crown needs to avoid actions, which would prevent the redress of Treaty settlements and avoid creating further grievances [16]. The Crown has an obligation not to devalue the currency of the settlement – in respect of both the QMS and the customary fishing provisions [17].

 

Tangata Tiaki

In 2002 the Minister of Fisheries confirmed the appointment of the Wairewa Tangata Tiaki in the area from the northern bank of the Hakatere River, following the coast to Ounu Hau Point at Pohatu, excluding Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere as defined as Quota Management Area ANG 13 in the Fisheries Act 1996) and its catchment, and excluding Lake Forsyth, then due east to the limit of the South Island fisheries waters, then following the boundary of the South Island fisheries waters to a point due east of the Hakatere River, and finally back to the northern bank of the Hakatere River. Notice Number: 8389

The Minister confirmed the Tangata Tiaki/Kaitiaki of Wairewa Rünanga, being the representative of tangata whenua holding manawhenua manamoana over the area/rohe moana, as Steve Tuuta, Rei Simon, Tony Edwards, Theo Bunker, Wayne Robinson and Robin Wybrow.

This means Wairewa Rünanga Tangata Tiaki are authorized to issue permits for customary food gathering in this area, which includes the area we know as Te Whata o Kökiro aka Dan Rogers.

This process was open and transparent and entered into in good faith.

We believe the proposed establishment of a Marine Reserve at Te Whata o Kökiro aka Dan Rogers will seriously undermine and transgress the Minister of Fisheries agreement under the customary regulations. We wonder how this can be reconciled.

It is important to reiterate once more that, based on the information provided by Wairewa Rünanga, Önuku Rünanga and Te Rünanga o Koukourärata throughout the taiäpure application process, the Taiäpure Tribunal of the Mäori Land Court confirmed the area occupied by the marine reserve application meets the statutory test for a taiäpure set out in section 174 of the Fisheries Act 1996 – the area is of special significance to the local hapü for spiritual and cultural reasons and for customary food gathering purposes. They stated that if the Dan Rogers marine reserve application is declined by Ministers (for whatever reason) then this area should then be included within the taiäpure. It is our view that Ministers cannot extinguish the customary fishing rights of us, the resident hapü and act consistently with the TOW(FC)SA.

Once again we reiterate our strong opposition to the establishment of a Marine Reserve at Te Whata o Kökiro for the reasons outlined above. We also believe the taiäpure management tool provides adequate management options for this area.

Nähaku noa,

 

Rei Simon

Secretary

Customary Fisheries Team Leader

Wairewa Rünanga

 

CC: Hon Jim Anderton, Minister of Fisheries
  Hon Parekura Horomea, Associate Minister of Fisheries, Minister of Mäori Affairs
  Hon Mahara Okeroa, Associate Minister of Conservation
  Russell Burnard, Allocations & Regulatory Services, Ministry of Fisheries
  Carl Ross, Customary Relationship Manager, Ministry of Fisheries
  Joe Wakefield, Pouhononga ki Kai Tahu, Ministry of Fisheries
  Nigel Scott, Customary Fisheries, Te Rünanga o Ngäi Tahu

 

[1] DOC, Giving Effect to the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi in the Work of the Department of Conservation February 2001; Muriwhenua Fishing Report 1992, p187; and “taonga” includes all valued resources and intangible cultural assets (Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Motonui - Waitara Claim, 2nd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1989, p51)
[2] R v Symonds (1847) NZPCC 388
[3] In re The Lundon and Whitaker Claims Act 1871 (1872) 2 NZCA 41, 49; With regard to customary fishing rights, this was confirmed by Te Weehi v Regional Fisheries Officer (1986) and then altered by the fisheries settlement acts – replaced the common law customary right with statutory definition – refer to footnote 35 for more discussion on this point.
[4] Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Motonui - Waitara Claim, 2nd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1989, p51
[5] DOC February 2001
[6] New Zealand Maori Council v Attorney-General [1987] 1 NZLR 673
[7] Ibid, p641, 663; Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Motonui - Waitara Claim, 2nd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1989, p52; Waitangi Tribunal, The Ngai Tahu Report 1991, 3 vols, Wellington, Brooker and Friend Ltd, 1991, Vol 1, p236.
[8] Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Manukau Claim, 2nd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1989, p70; Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Orakei Claim, 3rd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1996, p147; Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Muriwhenua Fishing Claim, 3rd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1996, p190-192; Waitangi Tribunal, The Ngäi Tahu Sea Fisheries Report 1992, Wellington, Brooker and Friend Ltd, 1992, p273.
[9] Waitangi Tribunal, The Turangi Township Report 1995, Wellington, Brookers Ltd, 1995, p289.
[10] New Zealand Maori Council v Attorney-General, p 664; Waitangi Tribunal, Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Manukau Claim, 2nd ed, Wellington, Government Printing Office, 1989, p70; Ngai Tahu Mäori Trust Board v Director-General of Conservation [1995] 3 NZLR 544.
[11] Waitangi Tribunal, The Mohaka River Report 1992, 2nd ed, Wellington, GP Publications, 1996, p77.
[12] Ngai Tahu Sea Fisheries Report 1992, p270.
[13] R v Symonds (1847) NZPCC 388.
[14] Tribal Policy on Principles of a TRoNT Treaty Framework – Refer to January 2002 TRoNT Minutes
[15] New Zealand Maori Council v Attorney-General, p 716.
[16] DOC February 2001
[17] MFish, The Crown’s Fisheries Obligations to Mäori – An Overview. 2000.

 

Back to Akaroa index page here >> >>

 

TOP

site designed by axys © 2003 option4. All rights reserved.