In January
2008 the High Court ruled that the Minister of Fisheries acted unlawfully
when trying to use section 13 of the Fisheries Act 1996 to reduce
the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Total Allowable Commercial Catch
(TACC) in the North Island orange roughy fish stock, Orange Roughy
1 (ORH1).
As a result of Justice Miller’s decision the Minister, Jim
Anderton, has gained Cabinet approval to initiate a process to urgently
amend section 13 of the Act to enable Ministerial decisions to be
made using current practice.
On April 7th 2008 commercial and non-commercial fishing representatives
were invited to an urgent meeting in Wellington to discuss the proposed
section 13 amendment. Changes to other parts of the Fisheries Act
were not being considered.
Non-commercial representatives responded hastily and sent two people
to the Wellington meeting on April 10th. Both representatives were
briefed by the Kahawai Legal Challenge team before their departure
and later reported back to the KLC team, the Hokianga Accord, New
Zealand Big Game Fishing Council and option4 teams.
Despite
repeated requests to MFish no record of the Wellington meeting was
ever provided. No advice of progress was received before non-commercial
fishing representatives became aware that MFish, the Seafood Industry
Council (SeaFIC) and Te Ohu Kaimoana (TOKM) had worked together
to draft an amendment to section 13 of the Fisheries Act.
A limited
number of interest groups were offered the opportunity to talk about
the Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Bill (No.2) with the Primary Production
Select Committee. A hearing was held on August 7th in Wellington.
Five representatives attended the hearing and spoke in more detail
about the joint submission from option4, the Hokianga Accord and
the NZ Big Game Fishing Council.
Section
13 Amendment |
Correspondence
and Process - Post hearing |
Maori
customary interests in s13 process
An
outline of Maori customary interests' involvement in the Ministry
of Fisheries' process to amend section 13 of the Fisheries
Act 1996. |
16
Oct 08
(Pdf
140Kb)
|
Amendment
becomes law
The
section 13 amendment is given Royal assent on 27th September
and takes effect as of the 28th September 2008. It is now
the Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Act 2008. |
28
Sep 08
(Pdf
170Kb)
|
Alert
#14 - Survey feedback
A
selection of comments received in response to the Alert #14
survey. Well worth a read. Then have your say too! |
Sept 2008
|
Alert
#14 - Sea's bounty at risk from unsustainable practices
Lowering
sustainability thresholds in fisheries management is risky
because of the potential to increase commercial fishing at
the expense of healthy fisheries and the public's access to
food...... |
17 Sep
08
|
Media
Release
Future
fisheries Ministers below sustainability threshold
Non-commercial
fishing representatives, both amateur and customary, are adamant
the Minister of Fisheries, Jim Anderton, has been thrown a
'hospital pass' with the heavily influenced section 13 advice
from MFish........ |
14
Sep 08
(Pdf
30Kb)
|
Dissection
and Rebuttal
An
analysis of the Minister of Fisheries' media statement in
response to the joint non-commercial statement (below), expressing
concerns about the Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Bill (No.2).
The Minister's comments are in black. Blue text represents
non-commercial's view. |
11
Sep 08
(Pdf
30Kb)
|
Media
Release
Fisheries
Ministry Motives Questioned Amidst Sustainability Risks
Non-commercial
fishing representatives, both amateur and customary, are raising
concerns about the Ministry of Fisheries' motives in rushing
legislation through Parliament before the election................ |
11 Sep
08
(Pdf
20Kb)
|
Important
questions raised and answered
Sustainable
fishing put further at risk?
Why
are non-commercial fishers so concerned about the proposed
amendment to section 13 of the Fisheries Act 1996?
Who
will be affected by the amendment?
Answers here.................... |
Sept 2008
(Pdf
30Kb)
|
SeaFIC
analysis of Amendment Bill
Amendment
update by Seafood NZ, a fishing industry magazine. A different
spin on what actually happened at the Select Committee hearing. |
Sep 2008
(Pdf
260Kb)
|
Select
Committee Report
The
Primary Production Committee recommends to parliament that
the Amendment Bill be passed with a few, minor amendments
to the text. The major focus on maximum justifiable catch,
as opposed to achieving the purpose of the Act, remains intact. |
22 Aug 08
(Pdf
140Kb)
|
Media
Release
Undemocratic
collusion of industry and Ministry undermines sustainable
fisheries. Media release concerning the proposed section 13
amendment from the Hokianga Accord, the NZ Big Game Fishing
Council and option4. |
21 Aug 08
(Pdf
30Kb)
|
Frequently
Asked Questions
What
is the issue with the proposed section 13 amendment?
Why
are MFish and the Minister advocating urgency to amend the
legislation when none exists?
Answers
to these and many other questions are available here............. |
21 Aug 08
(Pdf
30Kb)
|
Political
Party Analysis - Check out what your MP said.....
An
analysis of the different political party's stance on the
Amendment Bill. This contains excerpts from the Hansard record
of parliamentary debate. The full commentary of that debate
is below. |
Aug 2008
(Pdf
40Kb)
|
SeaFIC
analysis of Amendment Bill
Analysis of the
Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Bill (No.2) by Seafood NZ, a
fishing industry magazine. |
Aug 2008
(Pdf
130Kb)
|
Submissions
to Primary Production Committee |
Anton's Seafoods
Limited submission to the Select Committee. Anton's oppose
the Amendment Bill, but on different grounds to the reasons
put forward in the joint non-commercial submissions. A late
submission as Anton's were not originally invited to submit.
Caution:
Large file 3.7MB
|
19 Aug 08
(Pdf
3.7MB)
|
Hilborn 2006 paper referred to in the Anton's
submission. |
|
A
supplementary submission from the Hokianga Accord, option4
and the NZ Big Game Fishing Council addressing the concerns
raised during the Select Committee hearing on August 7th.
|
11 Aug 08
(Pdf
90Kb)
|
Primary Production Select
Committee hearing in Wellington. A team of five from the Hokianga
Accord, option4 and the NZ Big Game Fishing Council attended
the hearing and spoke with the politicians. |
|
The Royal Forest and Bird
Protection Society submits in support of the intention of
the Amendment Bill, provides some modification to the Bill's
wording and advocates for a more comprehensive review of sections
10, 13 and 14 of the Fisheries Act 1996. |
7 Aug 08
(Pdf
50Kb)
|
A comprehensive
submission from the Hokianga Accord, option4 and the NZ Big
Game Fishing Council asking for the Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment
Bill (No.2) to be withdrawn. |
5 Aug 08
(Pdf
140Kb)
|
Greenpeace NZ supports the
Amendment Bill with the provisos and changes suggested in
their submission. Greenpeace representatives also attended
the hearing and spoke with the Select Committee. |
4 Aug 08
(Pdf
90Kb)
|
The NZ Recreational Fishing
Council's submission to the Primary Production Committee prior
to its appearance at the hearing. The Council supports the
proposed amendment on condition that there are no negative
outcomes for amateur fishers. |
4 Aug 08
(Pdf
90Kb)
|
Submission on the Fisheries
Amendment Bill from the Environment and Conservation Organisations
of NZ. ECO supports changes to section 13 of the Fisheries
Act and suggested some changes to the text. |
3 Aug 08
(Pdf
400Kb)
|
Correspondence
and Process - Pre hearing |
Dissection
and Rebuttal
An analysis of
the proposed amendment - section 13(2A). This document is
a dissection and rebuttal of the Ministry and Minister of
Fisheries' claims made in the Bill's Explanatory Note given
to parliament.
|
Aug 2008
(Pdf
50Kb)
|
Invitation to option4 from
the Primary Production Committee, to give evidence to the
Select Committee at the hearing scheduled for 7th August.
option4 responded confirming its attendance as joint submitters
with the Hokianga Accord and the NZ Big Game Fishing Council. |
31 Jul 08
(Pdf
20Kb)
|
First
Reading of Amendment Bill continued.....
The first reading
of the Amendment Bill continues in parliament a week after
its first introduction. These notes have been highlighted.
|
29 Jul 08
(Pdf
540Kb)
|
Email from Terry Lynch, MFish's
Policy Manager, advising the section 13 amendment Bill has
been introduced into the House, would be referred to the Primary
Production Committee and reported back by 25 August. |
25 Jul 08
(Pdf
20Kb)
|
First
Reading of Amendment Bill
Jim Anderton introduces
the Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Bill No.2 to parliament
on 24th July 2008. This Bill seeks to amend section 13 of
the Act and alter the way the Minister of Fisheries sets
the total allowable catch (TAC). The Bill gets the immediate
support of the National Party.
|
24 Jul 08
(Pdf
400Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Amendment Bill
Fisheries Act
1996 Amendment Bill No.2, as introduced to parliament on
24th July 2008. This Bill seeks to amend section 13 of the
Act and alter the way the Minister of Fisheries sets the
total allowable catch (TAC).
|
July 2008
(Pdf
140Kb)
|
Email from MFish's Policy
Manager advising the section 13 amendment proposal is progressing
and that a Bill would be introduced into parliament the following
week. |
18 Jul 08
(Pdf
60Kb)
|
MFish letter to all stakeholders
updating information relating to a proposal to amend section
13 of the Fisheries Act 1996, before the end of the current
parliamentary term. Sent by email with the message dated 18
July (above). |
15 Jul 08
(Pdf
240Kb)
|
An outline of the review
of sections 13 and 14 of the Fisheries Act 1996, by the option4
team. This document offers a brief description of the problem
and a solution to address the current impasse and enable sustainable
fisheries management. |
May 2008
(Pdf
60Kb)
|
The Hokianga
Accord, in conjunction with the NZ Big Game Fishing Council
and option4, write to the Minister of Fisheries and offer
to assist in the development of an alternative approach to
enable TACs to be set to achieve both the purpose of the Act
and more fish in the water. |
18
Apr 08
(Pdf
30Kb) |
An overview, by non-commercial
fishing representatives, of the discussion held during the
April 10th meeting with MFish, commercial fishers, environmental
and non-commercial fishing interest group representatives.
|
11 Apr 08
(Pdf
40Kb)
|
Ten
fishing representatives attend urgent meeting in Wellington
to discuss a section 13 amendment with four MFish staff. Non-commercial
environmental, customary and amateur fishing representatives
seemed to have a common desire of increasing the biomass of
fish stocks for sustainability and utilisation, as defined
in section 8 of the Fisheries Act. |
|
MFish invitation to an urgent meeting
in Wellington, to discuss the effects of the High Court judgment,
the necessity for urgency and the potential form of an amendment
to section 13. |
7 Apr
08
|
Discussion
document from MFish describing the background issues and setting
out the options to amend section 13 of the Fisheries Act 1996. |
7 Apr
08
(Pdf 50Kb)
|
References
|
Primary
Production Committee
Details
of the eight Primary Production Committee members, from the
Labour, National and NZ First parties. |
July 2008
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
High
Court decision
High Court judgment
in favour of Antons Trawling Ltd, ruling the Minister of Fisheries
acted unlawfully when he used section 13(2) of the Fisheries
Act to reduce the Total Allowable Catch in Orange Roughy 1.
(Caution:
Large file 2.4MB) |
22 Feb 08
(Pdf 2.4MB)
|
Appeal Court decision
Interim
Order from the Appeal Court in relation to the challenge from
Antons Trawling Ltd to the Minister of Fisheries’ decision
to reduce the Total Allowable Catch and Total Allowable Commercial
Catch in Orange Roughy 1.
(Caution:
Large file 900Kb) |
19 Nov 07
(Pdf 900Kb)
|
Fisheries
Amendment Bill
Previous
attempt to amend the Fisheries Act 1996 due to the challenge
against the Minister of Fisheries’ decision to reduce
catch levels in Orange Roughy 1. Section 10 was the focus
in late 2006 and early 2007. |
2006-07
|
Fisheries
Act Purpose - Section 8
The
purpose of the Fisheries Act 1996 - sustainable utilisation
of fisheries. The High Court described this as, "….on
plain reading of s8 the bottom line is sustainability. That
must be the Minister's ultimate objective. Without it, there
will eventually be no utilisation". |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Sustainability measures - Section 13
Section
13 sets out the basis for how the Minister of Fisheries will
set a total allowable catch limit that will maintain the fishery
at or above a level that can produce the maximum sustainable
yield.... |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Sustainability measures - Section 14
Section
14 sets out an alternative process describing how the Minister
of Fisheries can set a total allowable catch limit for a fishery
listed in Schedule 3, to better achieve the purpose of the
Act. |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Sustainability measures - Section 14A
Section
14A sets out the basis for how the Minister of Fisheries can
set an alternative total allowable catch limit that will better
achieve the purpose of the Act. Both agreement from 95% of
quota owners and no detrimental effects on non-commercial
fishing interests are required before this section can be
applied. |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Sustainability measures - Section 14B
Section
14B sets out how the Minister of Fisheries can set an alternative
total allowable catch limit for a fishery so that commercial
fishers can exploit another fishery without being constrained
by the first catch limit. Both fisheries need to be maintained
above a level that ensures its long-term viability. |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|
Fisheries
Act Sustainability measures - Section 14C
Section
14C sets out the process for declaring that section 14B no
longer applies to a fishery. Either section 13 or 14 would
then need to be applied to that fishery. |
1996
(Pdf 20Kb)
|