Removing
surprises with marine planning
By Chris
Carter
This
article was originally published in the Otago Daily Times 2 November
2004
LOOKING
BACK now, it is hard to believe that passionate battles
were once fought over the establishment of a network of
national parks in the mountains and forests of New Zealand.
But history tells us those battles were fought and it now
appears they are set to occur all over again as we strive
to achieve a similar, if more modest, sort of national park
network in our vast marine area.
For evidence, consider
the fact that 3000 submissions have been received from the
public on a proposal to establish a marine reserve off Great
Barrier Island.
As Conservation Minister,
I am torn between a sense of hope that New Zealanders have
such an interest in our seas and a sense of frustration
that the debate about protecting small parts of them is
so needlessly fierce.
I say needlessly
because I am not convinced this debate is actually about
whether or not we should have marine reserves. Instead,
I think it reflects a need for more comprehensive, inclusive
and open planning about where protected areas are actually
located in New Zealand waters.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b77c/1b77c757adfa775e9ae12518ab3c83929fdb0a48" alt="" |
I regularly hear fishing
groups say: "We support the concept of marine reserves, just don't
put them in our favourite fishing spots." I'm mindful that recreational
fishing groups have actually supported a large number of marine
reserve proposals in the past. Yet, these same groups are now
in a lather about a pretty modest Government goal of placing 10%
of our massive marine area, the fourth largest in the world, under
some form of protection by 2010.
Fishing groups seem
to fear this goal will result in a sudden and indiscriminate blitzkrieg
of marine reserve proposals that will not be balanced with the
need to preserve fishing spots around the coastline. In other
words, they feel excluded from decision-making.
Realistically, they are
not. The statutory process requires that recreational fishing
groups be consulted about marine reserves. There is also a specific
legal test that asks if a reserve were put in a particular spot
would it have an undue impact on adjacent landowners, recreation
or fishing in a district.
However, this inclusion
of fishing views sometimes occurs only after a reserve has been
proposed. If there is a weakness in the current process it is
that there is insufficient systematic and open planning about
which areas should be suggested as reserves in the first place.
Some planning has gone
on in certain regions in the past but it has not been comprehensive
nationally. It is time it was.
My colleague, Fisheries
Minister David Benson-Pope, and I will shortly announce a national
marine protected areas action plan in which we will seek to rectify
this problem. We are envisaging a new region-byregion planning
process where the Department of Conservation, the Ministry of
Fisheries, local environmental and fishing groups, Maori and local
councils, sit down and organise the need for and nature of marine
protection in their district using the best available marine information.
They will have the opportunity
to collectively evaluate what marine environments exist in their
local waters, what areas are already protected, what are most
in need of protection, and how they can best protect them. In
doing so, they will have a whole variety of protection measures
at their disposal, marine reserve status being the most significant.
This process will mean
there are no surprises for any particular group, and all will
have a real opportunity to participate, up-front, in the design
of a network of marine protected areas. It will allow sensible
trade-offs and compromises between groups to be made in a regional
context, while advancing marine protection well beyond what we
have achieved at present.
I envisage marine reserve
applications that have already been notified, such as Great Barrier
Island, and the advanced proposals for Mimiwhangata (Northland)
and Nugget Point (Otago), proceeding through the current process,
but any further new applications occurring only after regional
planning.
In this way, I hope we
can learn from history and only fight the battles that need to
be fought, not those that don't.
After all, most New Zealanders
agree we are the custodians of a unique natural bounty that we
are only just beginning to understand. If we are to be successful
in preserving it, we need to work together.
TOP |