Home - option4.co.nz The more people we can get involved in these issues the better Fishing in New Zealand
   
SEARCH THIS SITE

 STAY INFORMED
YES I want to be
kept informed
Change existing options


Promote option4

Please help option4

 

 

Nugget Point Apr 2005

Definition of New Proposal Challenged

By Glenn Conway

 

This article was originally published in the Otago Daily Times 13 April 2005

Residents at odds with conservation minister . Nugget Point

Balclutha: Moves to form a Nugget Point guardians group instead of establishing a marine reserve there may already be dead in the water, but local people are threatening legal action to argue their point.

Conservation Minister Chris Carter has said he supports a new planning process involving environmental and fishing groups, councils, and government agencies when planning marine management in their areas, but only for new proposals.

   

In a recent speech, he described the proposed Nugget Point marine reserve as an "advanced" proposal, but one of the men keen to form a Nuggets guardians group disputes the minister's definition of what is a new or old proposal.

   

The Department of Conservation (Doc) first applied for a Nugget Point marine reserve in 1992. It was later shelved for several reasons, but Doc has confirmed it will lodge a fresh application to Mr Carter next month.

   

Tourism Catlins chairman Lionel Mason, who wants a local guardians group set up, said next month's application would clearly be for a new reserve.

  

 "It has new boundaries.-There has been an albeit flawed consultation process, all based around a new-look reserve. It's not an old proposal. It is a totally new one."

   

Mr Carter has kept out of the Nugget Point debate as he is a key statutory decisionmaker. But in a recent speech he supported a collective approach to managing marine environments. He wants a new region-by-region planning process in which Doc, the Ministry of Fisheries, environmental and fishing groups, Maori and local councils decide the need for and nature of marine protection in their area.

   

This would allow sensible trade-offs and compromises between groups - exactly the concept mooted by the Nuggets group.

  

Mr Mason said it seemed those seeking a guardians group and the minister were "on the same wavelength" and it was a shame the only thing that separated them from initiating the same concept at Nugget Point was a definition of what was an old and what was a fresh application.

   

"I think if we took this to court, we could easily prove this is a fresh, brand-new application down at the Nuggets."

   

A member of the Guardians of Fiordland Fisheries and Marine Environment, Otago conservationist Dr Alan Mark, has questioned if those seeking a Nuggets guardians group fully represent stakeholders and interested parties.

   

The would-be guardians include commercial and recreational fishers, tourism interests and local landowners, but Dr Mark said membership should be open to all people with an involvement or interest in the area if it was to be modelled on the Fiordland group.

   

"Moreover, their representatives should be formally elected for the role by their particular groups," he said in a statement.

   

In Nugget Point's case, this meant commercial and recreational fishers, tourism interests and the local community and Ngai Tahu and marine scientists.

 

TOP


site designed by axys © 2003 option4. All rights reserved.