1. |
Tiritiri Matangi |
|
a. |
NZUA release Marine reserve proposal Dec 2002 |
|
b. |
Submission deadline 28 February 2003 |
|
c. |
TAG formed Jan 2003 to oppose proposal |
|
d. |
Jan 23 meeting held in HCBC for club/ group reps to form action committee |
|
e. |
NZUA attended & addressed the meeting |
|
f. |
Feb 5th Karli Thomas (NZUA) was asked to provide an email address for email submissions |
|
g. |
Feb 6th auto email sent through advising Karli had left for OE; Peter Crabb will be avail from 17th Feb 2003 |
|
h. |
Email address secured by 21 Feb 2003 |
|
i. |
25th Feb notified by phone extension to submission period had been granted till 31st March ( 3 days before end of sub period) |
|
j. |
NZUA placed public notice in NZH 28th Feb – went unnoticed |
|
k. |
Some suggestion NZUA contacts advised well before 25th. |
|
l. |
NZUA sending out letters to online submitters dated 6th March “will be accepting only submissions on the enclosed questionnaire form” |
|
m. |
31st March submissions provided to NZUA, Rodney District Council, Minister of Fisheries; Minister of Conservation; NZ Recreational Fishing Council; NZ Big Game Fishing Council; option4 |
|
n |
6600 submissions total sent in to NZUA from TAG |
|
|
|
2 |
West Coast Plan |
|
a. |
Heard about plan around 18 months ago |
|
b. |
Contacted convenor of working group, Ken Catt – received leaflet (one of 15000 produced) |
|
c. |
1.58 million visitors to Muriwai & Kariotahi beaches alone (ARC figures) |
|
d. |
Nothing else received for last 18 months |
|
e. |
Received draft proposal 2nd April 2003 |
|
f. |
3000 brochures (draft proposals printed) |
|
g. |
Received discussion document 11th April 2003 |
|
h. |
80 discussion documents printed & posted |
|
i. |
Submissions close 31st May 2003 |
|
j. |
WCWG Reluctantly agreed to accept electronic submissions 4th May – Bethells public meeting |
|
k. |
Public meetings – Muriwai, Bethells, Waiuku, Waitakere City Council & Laingholm; Bethells and Laingholm meetings called by residents |
|
l. |
Franklin District Council not informed even though their area is included in the plan |
|
m. |
Draft proposal & discussion document are not same document |
|
n. |
Public meetings not discussing all matters in the discussion document & brochure – only a Marine Park |
|
o. |
Convenor calling public opposing his plan “Rent a Mob” after 1st public meeting at Muriwai |
|
p. |
Forest & Bird article in May edition of F & B magazine mentions 9 marine reserves, draft proposal has 5 marine reserves; West Coast Working Group still only discussing Marine Park publicly |
|
q. |
Overwhelming public opposition to plan; 3 out of 4 meetings opposition over 90% against the proposal |
|
r. |
There is a need for more consultation |
|
s. |
Request for time extension made 4th May, extension for 6 months |
|
t. |
13th May no advice re time extension; advised one month extension granted to 30 June 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
What’s the hurry with non-statutory stage? |
|
Need more consultation – not inclusive |
|
Need to consult with groups representing the public who go fishing for food – NZ Recreational Fishing Council, NZ Big Game Fishing Council & option4 |
|
Involve user groups of area concerned |
|
Wont hit a brick wall of opposition– flawed process |
|
Public support = effective protection & policing |