Your Right to Fish for Food
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd36/bbd36f11e0b807498ae2260d510794bd4e3d60bd" alt="Promote option4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c119/6c1194e1c60dd0a0e3370db246d7f1c5ae9c64c2" alt="Please help option4"
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01764/017646451f1b39d80544618d434787471fa56692" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01764/017646451f1b39d80544618d434787471fa56692" alt="" |
-
Swordfish
(Xiphias gladius) is a surface and midwater (primarily midwater)
dwelling, highly migratory species found in all tropical and
temperate oceans and large seas. Genetic studies suggest that
swordfish in the Pacific Ocean comprise several semi-independent
stocks: a western stock, a northeastern stock, a southeastern
stock and a central south stock that includes New Zealand waters.
-
Swordfish
do not form schools or dense aggregations. They move with prevailing
currents and are associated with convergence zones, strong thermoclines
or underwater features such as seamounts and shelving banks.
Male and female swordfish have different geographical and seasonal
distributions depending on size. In New Zealand waters there
is progressive increasing of the average size of swordfish for
increasing latitude beginning at latitude 40 degrees south.
-
Adult
swordfish are visual predators. Relying on their highly developed
eyes to detect prey in water where light is poor. They use their
rostrum (sword) to stun prey. They are diurnal feeders, spending
daylight hours near the seafloor feeding on demersal fish, they
move to the sea surface at night to feed on squid and pelagic
fish.
-
Within
Pacific waters, spawning takes place in tropical waters of the
western Pacific Ocean and to a lesser extent the equatorial
waters of the central Pacific Ocean. Swordfish are batch spawners,
perhaps as frequently as every few days over several months.
Eggs are spawned in the upper layers of the ocean and like the
protracted larval phase are pelagic. Swordfish have a large
reproductive capacity with egg production estimated to range
from 1 to 29 million (68–272 kg females respectively).
-
Estimates
of growth rate indicate very rapid growth during the first year
to between 0.9-1 metre in lower jaw to fork length (LJFL) and
10-15 kilograms of weight, with growth rate progressively slowing
with age. The differences in growth parameters between males
and females are significant with females growing faster than
males. Asymptotic length for males is 2.13 metres while asymptotic
length for females is about 3.00 metres LJFL. The maximum size
reported for a swordfish is 4.45 metres total length (includes
the bill and furthest extension of the tail) and about 540 kilograms
(Nakamura 1985). Swordfish reach sexual maturity at 5-6 years
of age. Ward and Elscot (2000) report that Australian swordfish
are moderately long-lived but apparently not beyond 25 years
of age.
TOP
Fisheries
Characteristics
Commercial catch
-
Two
types of swordfish fisheries have been characterised:
-
Convergence
fisheries; and
-
Topographic
fisheries.
-
The
swordfish fisheries of the North Pacific, the South Pacific
off Chile and the South Atlantic are convergence fisheries.
These fisheries are broadly distributed and associated with
currents and fronts in the open ocean. In general, convergence
fisheries are highly productive although productivity can be
variable depending on local environmental conditions, such as
the southern oscillation in Pacific waters.
-
Examples
of topographic swordfish fisheries include Florida, Hawaii and
Australia. Fishing occurs on particular features such as continental
slopes, banks and seamounts. As they develop topographic fisheries
are characterised by the fleet progressively expanding to new
grounds. Initially these new grounds have high catch rates but
local depletion can occur when swordfish are removed at a greater
rate that that at which growth and immigration can replace them.
It is not known for how long individual swordfish “reside”
around underwater features. However, mixing throughout swordfish
populations probably takes months if not years.
-
New
Zealand has many of the characteristics of a topographic type
swordfish fishery. The North Island blocks the eastwards extension
of the South Pacific’s western boundary current. Consequently,
the subtropical convergence zone is not as productive as elsewhere
in the Pacific. In addition, as discussed further in paragraph
89, the New Zealand fishery has had to expand in area to increase
swordfish catches.
-
The
commercial landings of swordfish are presented in Table 2.
Table
2: Reported landings (tonnes greenweight) of swordfish
by FMA for fishing years 1979-80 to 2002-03
Foreign licensed
vessels (Japan and Korea) |
Fish Yr |
FMA1 |
FMA2 |
FMA3 |
FMA4 |
FMA5 |
FMA6 |
FMA7 |
FMA8 |
FMA9 |
FMA10 |
? |
Total |
1979/80 |
51.4 |
306.1 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
1.1 |
9.7 |
386 |
1980/81 |
45.3 |
311.7 |
0.9 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
384.6 |
18.1 |
5.9 |
762 |
1981/82 |
124.7 |
357.4 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
239.4 |
12.2 |
2.7 |
738 |
1982/83 |
50.3 |
184.3 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
188.7 |
12.9 |
4.2 |
436 |
1983/84 |
73.0 |
163.9 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
142.7 |
9.2 |
2.0 |
389 |
1984/85 |
76.3 |
117.5 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
6.9 |
4.9 |
320 |
1985/86 |
51.8 |
235.5 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
373.6 |
17.1 |
7.9 |
679 |
1986/87 |
43.8 |
231.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
273.0 |
24.3 |
29.0 |
578 |
1987/88 |
15.9 |
258.8 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
10.1 |
0.7 |
290 |
1988/89 |
1.0 |
175.8 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
2.1 |
|
182 |
1989/90 |
0.3 |
172.2 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
2.1 |
194 |
1990/91 |
0.1 |
192.5 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
9.3 |
12.5 |
212 |
1991/92 |
2.4 |
172.1 |
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
195 |
1992/93 |
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
NZ Domestic &
Charter fleets |
1991/92 |
11.0 |
16.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
0.7 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
227 |
1992/93 |
27.3 |
12.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
5.4 |
|
|
1.7 |
0.1 |
|
110 |
1993/94 |
51.6 |
18.8 |
0.1 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
6.9 |
8.8 |
0.1 |
102 |
1994/95 |
54.6 |
22.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
10.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
102 |
1995/96 |
69.0 |
64.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
5.8 |
2.3 |
1.0 |
187 |
1996/97 |
98.4 |
85.7 |
|
1.8 |
|
5.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
30.8 |
|
1.2 |
283 |
1997/98 |
162.0 |
106.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
6.1 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
99 |
0.1 |
4.3 |
534 |
1998/99 |
253.7 |
208.8 |
|
19.7 |
|
24.8 |
12.4 |
12.4 |
139.5 |
15.7 |
4.5 |
939 |
1999/00 |
220.1 |
355.3 |
0.1 |
4.8 |
|
29.2 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
147.9 |
14.9 |
2.4 |
925 |
2000/01 |
273.7 |
399.0 |
0.2 |
22.7 |
|
12.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
152.9 |
37 |
0.5 |
1014 |
2001/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
972 |
2002/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
-
Before
the start of any domestic fishery, distant water longline fleets
were granted foreign license access to fish for southern bluefin
and bigeye tuna (Japan) and albacore (Korea). The swordfish
bycatch by the Japanese foreign licensed fishery averaged 388
tonnes per year between 1979-80 and 1992-93 with peak landings
of 761 tonnes in 1980-81 and 681 tonnes in 1985-86. The Korean
foreign licensed fishery reported only small catches of swordfish
(0 to 7 tonnes per year). Most of the Japanese swordfish catch
(85%) was from FMA 2 and FMA 9 while the Korean swordfish catch
was mostly (79%) from FMA 9 and FMA 10.
-
Declining
catches of striped marlin in the early 1980s led to the implementation
of the “Billfish Moratorium in Northern Waters”
in 1987. These regulations prohibited domestic commercial fishers
from taking any billfish. In addition, fishing by foreign licensed
tuna longline vessels was prohibited in the waters of the Auckland
Fisheries Management Area (FMAs 1 and 9). As part of the regulatory
provisions any billfish taken as bycatch could be tagged and
released. The terms of the moratorium on billfish for domestic
fishers were varied in 1993. The prohibition on taking swordfish
in FMAs 1 and 9 was removed and the prohibition on taking marlin
species was extended to include all NZ fisheries waters. At
that time domestic commercial fishers agreed to avoid fishing
certain areas to reduce conflict over recreational access to
swordfish. However, since 1993 the commercial domestic fleet
has grown much larger and no longer observes these area agreements.
-
In
general, landings of swordfish reflect the number of hooks placed
in the water for these species. The total number of hooks was
stable between 1985 and 1995 but increased between 1995 and
2000 with the effort progressively levelling off. Landings of
swordfish by domestic vessels have increased rapidly since 1994-95
peaking in landings of 1 014 tonnes in 2000-01. Since, landings
have progressively declined to 669 tonnes during 2002-03.
-
Swordfish
can be caught in most FMAs although most catches are from waters
north of latitude 40º S. Most domestic landings (86%) are reported
from FMA 1, FMA 2 and FMA 9.
-
Pelagic
and Tuna stakeholders group undertook analysis of the distribution
of broadbill swordfish catch during 1989 and 2001. From 1989-2001
most swordfish was taken along the edge of the continental shelf
off the east coast of the North Island. Highest catches were
reported off East Coast, Gisborne, in the Bay of Plenty, and
the Poor Knights shelf. Since 1995-96 the development of the
domestic tuna fishery resulted in a level of catch and an extension
of the geographic range where swordfish has been caught. In
the subsequent years, the fishery expanded northwards and down
the central east coast of the North Island. The fishery also
expanded to the northern west coast of the North Island.
Targeted
catch and bycatch
-
In
New Zealand waters, swordfish are primarily caught in the tuna
longline fishery as a bycatch when targeting bigeye, southern
bluefin tuna and to lesser extent albacore. For the domestic
fleet 75% of hooks are reported as targeting bigeye, 16% as
southern bluefin tuna, 7% as albacore and the remaining 2% other
tunas.
Table 3:
Estimated catches (tonnes greenweight) of swordfish reported by
target species for fishing years 1994-95 to 2002-03
Fishing year (a) |
Target species |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Bigeye |
40 |
63 |
82 |
196 |
371 |
423 |
518 |
418 |
266 |
Southern bluefin |
10 |
16 |
41 |
62 |
93 |
105 |
116 |
132 |
130 |
Albacore |
2 |
7 |
9 |
46 |
54 |
74 |
40 |
63 |
57 |
(a) Fishing year ‘1995’ is fishing year 1994–95
-
Swordfish
have occasionally been observed as a bycatch of the skipjack
tuna purse seine fishery (Habib et al. 1982) and in trawl fisheries
for jack mackerel (Anderson et al. 2000) and hoki (Clark et
al. 2000).
-
It
is known that swordfish catch rates can be increased by choice
of longline gear, longline setting strategy such as setting
at night and the using of lightsticks, hence there is considerable
potential for swordfish catches to increase or decrease depending
on the adoption of fishing practices [1].
-
Based
on MFish observer data, discard rates are about 0.4% of the
reported landings with most (57%) of the discarded swordfish
dead upon their return to the sea.
[1]
Factors affecting swordfish (Xiphias gladius) catch rate in
the New Zealand tuna longline fishery Murray and Griggs.
TOP
Number of domestic vessels catching and landing
-
The
number of domestic vessels reporting landings of swordfish by
year is shown in Table 4.
Table
4: Number of vessel reporting landings of swordfish for
fishing years 1996-97 to 2002-03
Fishing Year (a) |
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Vessels |
48 |
57 |
77 |
122 |
122 |
152 |
128 |
(a) Fishing year ‘1997’ is fishing year 1996–97
-
The
numbers of vessels that catch and report landing swordfish reflect
the development of an important surface longline fishery for
bigeye and southern bluefin tuna since 1996-97. There is a relatively
large number of vessels reporting landings of swordfish, consistent
with the largely bycatch nature of the fishery. The number of
vessels reporting swordfish landings decreased in 2002-03 since
peaking in 2001-02. This is associated with the decline in catch
for that year.
Recreational and customary catch
-
The
recreational fishery for billfish pre-dates the development
of a commercial fishery for large pelagic species by many years.
This recreational fishery is dominated by striped marlin but
there has always been a considerable recreational interest in
swordfish.
-
Angling
for swordfish involves floating baits near the surface while
drifting at night further from the coast that is routinely fished
by recreational vessels. Recreational swordfish fishing can
therefore be an uncomfortable experience in exposed oceanic
waters with the additional dangers of navigating at night. Accordingly,
recreational catches to date have been relatively small (if
most of the recreational catch is attributed to gamefishing,
the recreational catch has averaged seven swordfish per year
since 1987-88 with a maximum of 36 fish in 1992-93). Nevertheless,
the recreational sector’s interests and aspirations are
similar to those of commercial fishers in that it sees potential
for a recreational swordfish fishery to expand.
-
Recreational
fishers place considerable value on the retention of trophy-sized
swordfish within areas that are of particular interest to them.
Recreational fishers have expressed concern about the potential
impact the current level of commercial catch of swordfish might
be having on their fishery. While there are limited direct gear
conflicts, spatial conflict exists between the sectors particularly
in light of the current assumption that as in Australian waters
large New Zealand swordfish may have long residence times (in
preferred habitats within the EEZ), which make them vulnerable
to over fishing [2].
-
MFish
is not aware of any current customary Maori fishery for swordfish,
however it is known that swordfish have been harvested in the
past.
[2]
Swordfish - environmental - fishery interactions off eastern
Australia Campbell and Hobday, 2003
TOP
Regulatory
framework
-
From
1991 swordfish became subject to regulations that restricted
catch to bycatch only, except for those existing target fishers
who had received a fishing permit in previous years. This meant
swordfish could be legally landed only as bycatch of target
fishing for another species.
-
No
specific regulatory measures apply to the swordfish fishery
with the exception that regulations apply to the operation of
foreign owned vessels registered to fish within New Zealand
fisheries waters. These regulations include a provision excluding
the use of foreign owned tuna longline vessels in the Auckland
Fisheries Management Area from 1 October to 31 May in the following
year.
-
In
the Pacific other fleets catch swordfish and the Japanese in
particular have a long history of longlining for swordfish and
other tunas. During the 1980s, two studies assessed Pacific
swordfish stocks by applying equilibrium production models to
Japanese data. These studies provided similar results by suggesting
a MSY for Pacific swordfish to be about 20 000 tones per year
(range 18 000-28 000 tonnes). These assessments suggest that
the Pacific stock was under exploited until the early 1980s.
More recent assessments have been inconclusive and the condition
of the Pacific stock remains uncertain.
-
Stock
structure, longevity and productivity of the central south stock
are uncertain and little is known of the biology and ecology
of swordfish in this area. However, it is often assumed that
swordfish, particularly large swordfish, may have long residence
times which may make them vulnerable to over fishing.
-
Since
1998, swordfish landings in New Zealand have been stable and
for the most recent two years decreasing. However, there is
no evidence of declines in catch per unit of effort or in the
average swordfish size taken within New Zealand fisheries waters
that suggests that swordfish abundance is in decline or that
stock status is changing. (This conclusion is based on analysis
of catches up to 2001-02. Catch rates since the fishery peaked
in 2001-02 have yet to be analysed). There is some anecdotal
information from recreational and commercial fishers that swordfish
are not as abundant in some areas as they once were.
-
The
catch composition of surface long lining suggests distinct associations
between swordfish and a set of pelagic species. The main species
associated with long lining include: bigeye tuna, blue shark,
albacore tuna, Ray’s bream, southern bluefin tuna, porbeagle/mako
shark, dealfish, moonfish, oilfish, and deepwater dogfish.
-
Sharks
and marine mammals such as sperm whales, false killer whales
and killer whales are known to predate swordfish. Sharks, particularly
mako and blue shark, attacking swordfish hooked on longlines
are a source of wastage in the fishery.
-
As
mentioned, swordfish is primarily caught in the tuna longline
fishery as a bycatch when targeting bigeye and southern bluefin
tuna. Bigeye tuna and southern bluefin are being introduced
into the QMS at the same time as swordfish. MFish has considered
economic implications of setting TACCs for associated species
starting at paragraph 117 below.
-
Swordfish,
as high-level predators, form an important ecological relationship
with their prey, and possibly with some marine mammals. The
effect on the ecosystem of large-scale removals of a single
species is unknown.
-
In
New Zealand waters swordfish is primarily taken by surface longline.
Environmental issues are common to the fishing method rather
than specific to fishing for swordfish. Long lining is not considered
to have any direct effects on swordfish habitats.
-
A wide
range of fish species are taken as bycatch of surface longline
fishing. Catches of these species vary but many of these are
only rarely taken. The main fish bycatch species associated
with the New Zealand surface longline fisheries are being considered
for introduction into the QMS. This will provide the mechanisms
for sustainability actions as required.
-
There
is also a non-fish bycatch associated with the surface longline
fishery. Fishing vessels sometimes capture seabirds that are
chasing baited hooks, and the seabirds drown as the lines sink.
Seabirds are also caught in trawl and other fisheries, but longliners
are considered to be the main threat to several vulnerable albatrosses
and other seabird species. The risks of seabird capture vary
geographically and by species. An active programme is underway
to mitigate and monitor the capture of seabirds in surface longline
fisheries.
-
MFish
has established standard environmental controls on line and
trawl target fisheries to mitigate the impact of these fishing
methods on seabirds. These include prohibitions on net sonde
monitor cables and compulsory reporting of bycatch of protected
species. New Zealand surface longline vessels are required to
use tori lines of a specified standard. Vessels are using a
variety of practices to reduce seabird bycatch including the
use of artificial baits and the practice of setting longlines
at night.
-
MFish
and the Department of Conservation are currently evaluating
submissions on a draft National Plan of Action (NPOA) for Seabirds
that is expected to result in additional measures that will
apply to all fishing vessels fishing for swordfish. Surface
longlining is identified by the NPOA as having known interactions
with seabirds. Therefore, stakeholders will need to develop
an effective code of practise for this method by 2004.
-
Information
on the New Zealand fishery (catch per unit of effort) is routinely
contributed to the international status reports for the central
southern Pacific swordfish stock. Factors affecting CPUE have
been evaluated for the New Zealand longline fishery. Age and
growth and the stock structure of New Zealand swordfish are
currently being investigated.
-
Research
on the interrelationships between swordfish and other elements
of the aquatic environment has been identified as an area for
future consideration, however, this is a complex area of study
and it is unlikely to be undertaken in the foreseeable future.
-
As
mentioned, obtaining reliable estimates of recreational catch
for swordfish has proved difficult. Further work to estimate,
and to differentiate, recreational catches and landings are
required.
Social,
Cultural, and Economic Factors
-
Swordfish
is a medium value species that is an important component of
the domestic tuna longline fishery in New Zealand. MFish considers
introduction of swordfish into the QMS has economic benefits
for commercial fishers by allowing fishers to fish for swordfish
in a way that optimises the value of the catch.
-
However,
there will be short-term impacts arising from introducing swordfish
into the QMS associated with the need for individual fishers
to acquire quota to reflect their current fishing operations.
Swordfish landings in the criteria years for catch history were
substantially smaller than they are currently.
-
Two
other socio economic factors have been considered:
-
Are
there any socio economic implications of the proposed TACC in
comparison to recent landings of swordfish?
-
Are
there any socio economic implications of setting the proposed
TACC for swordfish with respect to anticipated levels of bycatch
under proposed TACCs set for its main target species?
-
The
proposed TACC is based on the average of the most recent years
landings and therefore no direct socio-economic impact is predicted.
-
The
main target species of swordfish are being introduced into the
QMS at the same time as swordfish. There could be important
implications for fishing for bigeye tuna or southern bluefin
tuna if the proposed TACC for swordfish impacts on the ability
of fishers to target species in fisheries where swordfish is
taken as a bycatch.
-
To
address this issue, MFish has analysed the level of bycatch
recently reported for swordfish in greater detail. As mentioned,
there have been changes in fishing practise that has resulted
in the proportion of swordfish bycatch increasing in some target
fisheries. MFish considers that the bycatch reported over the
past six years provides the best point of comparison for comparing
TACC options and ascertaining whether fishing for associated
species might be affected.
Table
5: Target landings of Bigeye tuna (BIG), southern bluefin
tuna (STN) and albacore tuna (ALB) and bycatch landings of swordfish
(SWO) with ratios of the landings by weight.
Year |
BIG |
SWO |
RATIO |
STN |
SWO |
RATIO |
ALB |
SWO |
RATIO |
1997-98 |
213 |
196 |
0.92 |
234 |
62 |
0.27 |
286 |
46 |
0.16 |
1998-99 |
267 |
371 |
1.39 |
286 |
93 |
0.32 |
219 |
54 |
0.25 |
1999-00 |
370 |
423 |
1.14 |
240 |
105 |
0.44 |
205 |
74 |
0.36 |
2000-01 |
374 |
518 |
1.39 |
258 |
116 |
0.45 |
181 |
40 |
0.22 |
2001-02 |
210 |
418 |
1.99 |
336 |
132 |
0.39 |
374 |
63 |
0.17 |
2002-03 |
135 |
266 |
1.96 |
271 |
130 |
0.48 |
643 |
57 |
0.09 |
-
Swordfish
bycatch is associated with target fishing for bigeye tuna and
southern bluefin tuna. The level of swordfish bycatch reported
from each of the bigeye and southern bluefin tuna fisheries
and the ratio of bycatch species to target species weights has
been increasing over the past six years. The albacore fishery
and its associated bycatch of swordfish is more stable. However,
MFish does not consider that recent reported commercial swordfish
landings necessarily represent a minimum level in terms of a
manageable bycatch. It is known that swordfish catch rates can
be increased by choice of longline gear, longline setting strategy
such as setting at night and the using of lightsticks, hence
there is considerable potential for swordfish catches to increase
or decrease depending on the adoption of fishing practices.
In a largely unrestrained management environment it is to be
expected that some fishers have attempted to optimise the level
of bycatch of swordfish as suggested by the data in the above
table.
-
Fishery
characteristics (particularly the relationship between swordfish
and other target fisheries) indicate that the TACC proposed
will provide a manageable level of bycatch without detrimentally
affecting the targeting of associated fisheries. In some circumstances
changes in fishing practices might be necessary. As discussed,
bycatch levels of swordfish can be substantially reduced with
a concomitant reduction in the risk of any economic impact associated
with constraints on fishing imposed by any of the current proposals.
-
Though
not a common catch of recreational fishers swordfish is highly
prized when caught. Maori probably does not consider swordfish
to be a species of particular importance.
|
|