Kahawai Final Advice Paper
Ministry
of Fisheries
29
June 2004
Biological
and Fishery Information
Submissions
-
Non-Commercial
Fishers submit that the best available estimate of natural mortality
is not used in the 1996 stock assessment (refer to the section
on the use of the 1996 stock assessment). Other submissions
received did not raise any issues concerning the biological
information for kahawai provided in the IPP (refer para 78-81).
-
Submissions
from Non-Commercial Fishers, TOKM, NIFCL and Sanford referred
to inaccuracies in the catch statistics reported in the IPP
and Non-Commercial Fishers submitted that a longer time series
of commercial catches should have been reported to indicate
past trends in the commercial fishery.
-
Revised
commercial catch statistics have been prepared and these cover
a longer time period than that shown in the IPP. These are shown
graphically in Figure 1 in the
section outlining the trends in utilisation of kahawai.
Environmental
Considerations
Submissions
-
Richard
Pollock submits kahawai is an integral food source of a wide
range of other carnivorous fish, dolphins and whales.
-
Non-Commercial
Fishers believe that the decline in kahawai abundance is linked
to anecdotal accounts of greater numbers of barracouta in northern
waters since 1990. The submission quotes a charter boat skipper
and ex-commercial fisher who believes that barracouta have extended
their temperature preference and range northwards in response
to a niche vacancy allowed for by the disappearance of kahawai
schools.
-
Non-Commercial
Fishers note that kahawai is one of the few inshore species
that push krill and small fish to the surface where seabirds
can reach them. While Non-Commercial Fishers states it is not
aware of any study conducted to examine the relationship between
food availability and nesting success of seabirds it submits
that any reduction in the number of kahawai schools has the
potential to impact on seabirds, particularly their ability
to feed their offspring. Submissions consider that the most
notable decline amongst seabirds has been in white fronted terns,
which are known as “kahawai birds”. Non-Commercial
Fishers submit that MFish have not adequately addressed the
effect of declining kahawai stocks on associated and dependent
species.
-
The
BOPCB submission refers to a report that concludes that the
lack of knowledge about marine species and their role in maintaining
the integrity and resilience of marine ecosystems poses a serious
risk for New Zealand [1]. It submits
that kahawai have a unique role to play in terms of biodiversity
and the interdependence of a broad range of other species and
expresses concern regarding the impact of reduced kahawai stocks.
-
A number
of submitters raise environmental issues that they consider
are relevant to the determination of TACs for kahawai stocks.
MFish notes that environmental issues and the related statutory
considerations are addressed in the IPP at paragraphs 119-122
and paragraph 65 (a)-(g) respectively. In summary, MFish has
identified the likely importance of kahawai in the food chain.
This is a matter that you can take into account when determining
a target biomass for kahawai and the setting of TACs for kahawai
stocks.
-
In
relation to specific submissions, MFish notes that stocks of
barracouta and kahawai overlap their distributions throughout
most of their respective ranges along the coastlines of both
the North and South Island. They have broadly similar niche
requirements and are often associated when forming summer feeding
aggregations particularly around schools of juvenile jack mackerels
or pelagic crustaceans. Tagged barracouta have moved considerable
distances (up to 500 nautical miles). It is probably not surprising
that at various times particularly when forming these summer
feeding aggregations that barracouta are found further north
(and kahawai are found further south) than is usual, depending
on the movements of their prey. MFish considers this to be a
more plausible explanation for the fisher’s observations
than niche displacement of one exploited stock by another.
-
MFish
notes that potential effects of reduced kahawai abundance on
seabirds were addressed in the IPP at para 119. MFish is aware
of one NZ research paper (Robertson 1992) on the effects of
food supplies on seabirds. Contrary to the views of submitters,
Robertson speculated that reduction of the populations of barracouta,
kahawai, gemfish, skipjack and albacore tuna from commercial
fishing may have allowed small pelagic species to increase in
abundance and which may be contributing to the observed increase
in the NZ gannet population during recent decades [2].
While the white fronted tern was once more abundant around the
coast, its declining population is believed to be due to predation
by stoats, dogs, rats and mustelids. Its accessible nesting
habit makes this species particularly vulnerable to disturbance
[3]. International research has
concluded that only extreme food shortages cause significant
adult bird mortality. However, poor to moderate availability
of food can reduce adult body weight, clutch size, breeding
success, colony attendance and the growth rates of chicks [4].
-
In
summary, the literature suggests that the potential for impacts
on other aquatic life is more complex that suggested by submitters.
While the potential impacts of sustainable fisheries on seabird
populations are likely to be minimal the potentially important
role of kahawai in the ecosystem as both a pelagic predator
and prey species emphasises the need for caution in management.
[1]
Report of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment,
1999: Setting Course for a Sustainable Future: The Management of
New Zealand's Marine Environment.
[2]
Robertson, D.A. (1992) Diet of the Australasian gannet
(Morus serrator) around New Zealand New Zealand Journal of Ecology
16(2): 77-81
[3]
Roberston C.J.R. editor (1985) The Complete Book of New
Zealand Birds.
[4]
Cairns, D.K. (1987) Seabirds as indicators of marine
food supplies. Biological Oceanography. 5: 261-271 and Cairns, D.K.
(1992) Bridging the gap between ornithology and fisheries science:use
of seabird data in stock assessment models The Condor 94: 811-824
|