Flatfish
1 (FLA1) Flounder
option4
Submission
10
August 2005
Flounder
1 (FLA1) West & East Coast North Island fishery
1.
Introduction
The Ministry of Fisheries
(MFish) has advised that they are reviewing catch limits for Flatfish
(FLA1) in response to expressions of concern from coastal communities
about sustainability and local depletion of stocks in various harbours
on the west coast of the North Island.
An Initial Position Paper
(IPP) was issued to stakeholders on 30 June 2005. MFish has invited
stakeholders to provide comments on the consultation document.
Original deadline for comments
was 29th July 2005. MFish then extended the deadline to 10th August.
This document comprises the
submission from option4 an NGO which promotes the interests of non-commercial
marine fishers in New Zealand.
2.
Ministry of Fisheries Proposals
The following management
measures are proposed by the Ministry of Fisheries for the FLA 1
fishery for the 2005 - 06 fishing year:
EITHER
Option
1
Set a TAC of 1 382 tonnes
for FLA 1 and within that TAC set:
- a customary allowance of 270 tonnes;
- a recreational allowance of 270 tonnes;
- an allowance of 27 tonnes for other sources of fishing-related
mortality; and a TACC of 815 tonnes.
OR
Option
2
Set a TAC of 1 307 tonnes
for FLA 1 and within that TAC set:
- a customary allowance of 270 tonnes;
- a recreational allowance of 270 tonnes;
- an allowance of 27 tonnes for other sources of fishing-related
mortality; and a TACC of 740 tonnes.
The current TACC is 1187
tonnes. A TAC and other allowances have not yet been set for FLA 1.
Both options propose to base the TAC, TACC, and allowances
on recent catches.
The proposed TAC, TACC,
and allowances are set out in Table 1.
Table 1: The
proposed TAC (tonnes), TACC (tonnes) and allowances (tonnes) for
FLA 1 for the 2005-06 fishing year
|
Proposed
TAC
|
Customary
allowance
|
Recreational
allowance
|
Other
sources of fishing-related mortality |
Proposed
TACC |
Option
1
(TAC
based on recent catch) |
1 382
|
270
|
270
|
27
|
815
|
Option
2
(TAC
based on recent catch) |
1 307
|
270
|
270
|
27
|
740
|
3.
option4 Submission
3.1 Proportional
Allocation Decisions
The attached paper on Proportional
Allocation of Fisheries Resources in NZ (Appendix One) is a
major part of this submission and must be read in conjunction with
it. We ask that the issues raised in the Proportional Allocation
of Fisheries document along with the fishery specific issues raised
in this document be addressed by the Ministry in the Final Advice
Paper on which the Minister bases his decision.
3.2 Consultation
The timeframe allowed for
consultation by the Ministry of Fisheries is unworkable for many
non-commercial stakeholders with an interest in the fisheries being
reviewed this year. The time between delivery of the IPP and submission
deadline is too short for adequate consultation with the diverse
range of non-commercial fishing interests who could be affected
by this years proposals. option4 comments on the consultation process
are included in this submission as Appendix
Two .
3.3 Flatfish (FLA1)
Flounder are an easily accessible
species important for the social and cultural wellbeing of many
local communities. The west coast flounder stock in particular has
been allowed to become depleted through excessive Total Allowable
Commercial Catch (TACC) being allocated since the introduction of
the QMS.
We are concerned that neither
of the two proposed options may fully address community concerns
about access to and sustainability of the fishery. Option two is
the only option that borders on being credible because it may actually
constrain commercial catch in some years. Option one is unlikely
to constrain commercial catches at all.
option4 notes that initial
FLA1 quotas were set at a high level based on 1983 catch levels.
This was the highest catch on record. MFish now considers the existing
TACC appears to be artificially high given that it has never been
caught. They also note that inter-annual abundance is not as variable
as previously thought. Both of these factors indicate the TACC has
always been set too high.
TOP
3.4
Commercial Catch
As the TACC has never constrained
commercial catch in this fishery it has always been fished intensely.
This intensive fishing effort has caused serious conflict between
commercial and non-commercial fishing interests.
We note a declining trend
is evident in major fisheries like the Kaipara Harbour. Catch rates
peaked in the 1990's and have subsequently declined. This is indicative
of "localised" depletion within the harbour according to MFish.
We stress "localised" as this is the biggest harbour in the Southern
Hemisphere and in our opinion should be a separate QMA.
The ability of commercial
fishers to deplete a harbour as large as the Kaipara to the detriment
of local communities shows the absurdity of the size of the Quota
Management Area (QMA) for FLA1. This fishery extends from Taranaki,
around North Cape and down to Cape Runaway on the East Coast.
The combination of excess
quota and massive size of the QMA has led to the development of
a mobile fleet of set netters capable of depleting entire harbours
until they become uneconomic to fish. Just as the fishery starts
to recover the mobile commercial fleet returns and repeats the depletion.
This behaviour has been to the detriment of local non-commercial
interests (and sometimes local commercial set netters) and is a
major cause of conflict.
We are disappointed that
none of the proposals deal with the main issues in this fishery.
While reducing quotas to ACTUAL current catch levels will possibly
prevent the conflict from escalating, the current level of conflict
will likely continue. Those who have been fighting for years to
have sensible management of these fisheries will yet again feel
the Ministry has failed to deal with the real issues. The QMS has
failed to deliver fisheries management for flounder that meets the
social and cultural expectations of many coastal communities.
3.5 Initial Allocations
Commercial fishing interests
have had priority in this fishery since the introduction of the
QMS. The excessive quotas issued have allowed commercial fishing
interests to determine the biomass available to non-commercial fishers
through the Ministry of Fisheries failing to constrain commercial
catch.
The commercial sector has
been able to fish vast areas within FLA1 until the area is no longer
economically viable before moving to the next area. Because flounder
are a fast growing species this behaviour has been repeated annually
and has caused serious conflict between commercial fishers and communities,
which has been well documented.
As the Minister will be setting
initial allocations for non-commercial fishers in FLA1 we ask that
the points raised in proportional document
(Appendix One) and the fishery specific points above be drawn to
the Minister's attention in the FAP.
3.6
Maori Fishing Interests
Flounder and mullet are considered
a taonga, a treasure. Both species are also important food sources
for local communities in many harbour and estuarine areas. Historically,
both of these species were readily available, easily caught and
accessible. Sadly, with the depletion of the flounder and mullet
stocks this is no longer the case. Maori can no longer meet their
social and cultural needs.
At the recent hui at Whakamaharatanga
Marae, Hokianga, (which MFish officials attended) Maori leaders
were put in the embarrassing position of having to apologise for
the small size of the flounder they had caught locally and provided
to the manuhiri (visitors) for dinner.
Sonny Tau, Chairman of Te
Runanga A Iwi O Ngapuhi, recently made the following comment, "
We treasure flounder and mullet as an integral part of our ability
to manaaki our manuhiri".
Ngapuhi's Professor Manuka
Henare summarises manaakitanga in this way: "manaaki tanga relates
to the finer qualities of people, rather than just to their material
possessions. It is the principle of the quality of caring,
kindness, hospitality and showing respect for others. To exhibit
manaakitanga is to raise ones mana (manaaki) through generosity."
Maori customary fishing must be allowed for, manaaki manuhiri
is paramount.
Sonny added "Prior to the
signing of the Sealords deal when Maori went fishing to feed their
babies they were fishing customarily. Since the 1992 settlement
99% of the time Maori now go fishing to feed their babies, they
are categorised as recreational fishers."
Over the past few months
two hui have been held with Ngapuhi, other northern iwi and recreational
non-commercial fishing interests. The outcome of both hui was very
clear; there are insufficient fish in the water, including mullet
and flounder, to meet the needs or aspirations of Maori, whether
they are fishing to feed their family (currently categorised as
recreational fishing) or for customary purposes. The flounder and
mullet fisheries must be rebuilt so that the reasonable needs of
tangata whenua can be met.
Both hui unanimously agreed
that achieving "more fish in the water" is the
only way to resolve their concerns. The agreement reached at Whakamaharatanga
Marae in Hokianga was formalised into one document (Appendix
Three) and will the basis of future discussions between non-commercial
fishing interests and the Ministry of Fisheries.
Ongoing mismanagement of
our inshore shared fisheries has come at a high social, cultural
and economic cost for Maori. Tangata whenua do not want to continue
to bear the brunt of MFish's inability to manage inshore fisheries.
TOP
4.
option4 Conclusion for Flounder
We are concerned that neither
option put forward in the Initial Position Paper (IPP) is capable
of addressing community concerns regarding access to, or the sustainability
of, the flounder fishery.
As the Minister is required
to "allow for" non-commercial interests we recommend option two
as a minimum first step. This is because option two is more likely
to reduce the risk of further escalating the conflict
in communities that have borne the brunt of the poor management
of the flounder fishery to date.
Other solutions are obvious
and necessary to actually address the real issues.
We ask that these be considered in addition to option two:
- This QMA is far too large for effective management of the flounder
fishery on a local scale. The QMA needs to be subdivided and sustainable
quotas allocated to contentious areas so that these fisheries
can rebuild and non-commercial fishing can be properly allowed
for.
- Flounder are a fast growing species and set netting is the main
commercial method used in harbours. An increase in the minimum
set net mesh size for commercial fishers only
would increase the biomass, and availability of flounder to non-commercial
fishers fairly quickly. It would also increase commercial yield
per recruit in the fishery. The capture and mortality of small
flounder would be also be reduced at higher mesh sizes. A further
benefit would be a significant reduction in the mortality of other
juvenile fish found in harbours. The wasteful catch of undersized
snapper, trevally, small dogfish and gurnard would decline markedly.
- Set netting can be an extremely wasteful method when nets are
left to soak for extended periods of time in areas where sea lice
are present. The current maximum soak times are far too long at
18 hours. If actual soak times prevalent in the fishery now can
be reduced, then wastage to scavenging will be reduced and productivity
increased.
4.1
In addition to the above option4 submits that the Minister:
- Reduces the TACC to significantly less than 740 tonnes to allow
this fishery to rebuild.
- Sets in place a mechanism where FLA1 can be subdivided into
smaller QMA's so that community concerns can be addressed.
- Sets in place a mechanism to review the minimum mesh sizes in
the FLA1 fishery.
- Sets in place a process to review soak times to reduce unnecessary
wastage.
- Makes no changes to non-commercial bag limits, size limits or
gear restrictions.
- Sets the non-commercial allowances at a level sufficient to
cover current or expected non-commercial catch.
- Notes that non-commercial access has been adversely affected
by lack of constraint on commercial catch and that the allowance
is not a fixed proportional division of the FLA1 fishery.
- Notes that recreational catch estimates and allowances are uncertain
and will be subject to review when better catch information is
available.
THANK
YOU to all those who submitted in support of this option4
submission.
Submission
deadline has closed.
|
TOP
|