Home - option4.co.nz The more people we can get involved in these issues the better
   
SEARCH THIS SITE

Promote option4

Please help option4

 

 

Hui Presentation


Hui Presentation to the Iwi Chairpersons Hui

Pipitea Marae, Wellington

by Sonny Tau

2nd-4th March 2006

 

« « « Back to Page One

PDF 130Kb

 

This speech was given to the hui on Friday 3rd March 2006 by Sonny Tau

Page Two Contents:  
Customary tools  
Conflicts of interest  
Marine reserves  
Conclusion  

 

Customary Tools

The customary tools we have available to us are just being rolled out and are already under severe attack from industry. Mataitai-the God send for looking after local tauranga ika, are subject to a "race for space" with DoC who is pouring millions of dollars into securing "no take forever marine reserves" at the expense of hapu having opportunity to deliver Kaitiakitanga.

Some of these reserves are over our best traditional hapu fishing grounds. I will address this subject later.

Even worse, those hapu who do get their act together and apply for mataitai come up against a wall of ignorance. The public have not been kept informed and draw all sorts of conclusions about the intent of Maori to manage important traditional fisheries.

There is more – we now realise the threat of legal action which hangs over the roll out of mataitai – not from the public but from commercial fishing interests, including Maori. Again, we find ourselves getting kicked around – this political football must be kicked into touch, NOW.  

Ministry have created a powerful property right for commercial operators around quota, which they will defend with whatever they have at their disposal. Challenges by anyone who gets in the road of these rights, usually end up in court.

Our own AFL is using arguments with Government that could undermine these customary tools. I wonder if they have spoken to other iwi about their concerns, they have certainly not sought feedback from Ngapuhi on the matter of customary tools. They should be worrying about maximising returns to iwi with what is available to them rather than getting involved in iwi politics. A dividend back to iwi will be nice.  

All iwi chairs hooked into our chairmen e-mail network would have received a copy of the letter sent to the Minister by industry, aided by a very senior employee of AFL. The letter outlined concerns they had with the implementation of Mataitai. We own that company, why are we not informed about their concerns? Their concerns strike at the very heart of our Treaty of Waitangi Settlement, especially the customary tools section and have the potential to erode these rights.

I said at the Ngati Kahungunu conference that I will bring this matter to the attention of this forum. What are we to do about this? It is about time we as chairs of our respective iwi meet collectively with industry and talk through the issues.  

Maori in turn must rigorously defend these customary tools. I am sure that MFish will assist us in this area.

 

Conflicts of interests

Ministry are quick to highlight the conflict that exists between commercial and recreational fishers. While this does exist in some fisheries, the true conflict for Maori is in:

  • the mismanagement of our fisheries by the Ministry
  • the mis-allocation of those fisheries resourses between each sector

  and

  • the interpretations of the Fisheries Act.

Until these problems are addressed the needs of our future generations will not be met, as per the purpose of the Fisheries Act. Ngapuhi, being the largest iwi in the country and growing, want to ensure our tamariki have kaimoana on their tables to feed our mokopuna and especially to manaaki our Manuhiri.

As we all know, kaimoana is one of the highest mana enhancing mechanism known to the Maori psyche.  

TOP

Marine Reserves

The Government has its many executive arms and many departments. Of these the Ministry of Fisheries and the Department of Conservation affect us most when we go fishing.

Understandingly, there has to be some constraint around fishing to retain the mauri, or lifeblood of the Tangaroa, particularly when we have the power to destroy it. But the question I ask is, what is DoC doing there? What are these tree hugging landlubbers doing at sea? And why do they want ten, twenty and even thirty percent of our coastline locked up forever? They must have some good reasons to deny our tamariki their piece forever.

The Marine Reserves Act, which is a completely unnecessary piece of legislation, was intended to protect one bit of sea around Goat Island for scientists to study - fair enough, but the Fisheries Act could have done the same. Then it grew and grew totally out of proportion. Then the Rogernomic's administration shuffled all land reserves to a new organisation, DoC, and with it marine reserves.

Marine reserves are places in the sea which, when undisturbed, may return to a more pristine state, which could benefit scientific study, tourism, education, biodiversity and perhaps even fishing. So, naturally where they benefit society, we should have more of these.

At the moment around 150 square kilometres is in marine reserves, and we already have 3000 square kilometres in de-facto protection. These are the cable ways and ammunition dumps, where trawling and other forms of fishing is prohibited. Do these provide for scientific study, tourism, education and benefits for fishing? Do we find huge stocks of fish there? No we don't.

So why should marine reserves, which are no different, suddenly provide these perceived benefits? Well, they don't either.

A marine scientist, Floor Anthoni said, "We now have some twenty fully protected marine reserves around our coasts, and none of these is working to save the environment, biodiversity or increase fish stock. Why not? Because in as little as twenty years, a new threat has become dominant: sick seas. Sick seas affect all marine organisms, particularly in their larval stages. So the fish live shorter, spawn less, and their offspring is murdered by voracious bacteria before they are big enough to leave the plankton. The mauri of Tangaroa is sick. Because the baby fish are not arriving, it looks as if we are overfishing, and we are blaming one another for this. So, we have a big problem."

He went on, "the problem begins on the land. We are losing our precious soils as at the same time this is killing our nutritious fish and also taking our beloved beaches away. How can we be so stupid three times over? How can we be so blind"?

Now DoC is taking the sea by stealth. They have cleverly devised a new Marine Protected Areas Implementation Policy that unites all government departments and local government while dividing those who use the sea.

It is a tool used by world dictators, to gain and remain in control. Now it has descended upon us, a plan to fast-track marine reserves while smothering opposition and democratic debate as well as honest consultation.

Is this what we want? Is this the way forward? Is this how we wish to be remembered by our tamariki? I don't think so.

I believe there is room for Marine reserves in certain areas but let us be clear here, marine reserves do not conserve fish. Fish do not survey their own particular areas and stay there. When they did a survey in the north, within a boat length they caught two snapper, one was tagged at Tutukaka in the north and the other wore a tag from Tauranga so fish don't stay in the one place.

Let us agree on one thing. We don't really want marine reserves if these do not help to save the sea. But we do need to take remedial action now. We really need to be smarter.

With the race for space I spoke about earlier in my korero, Marine reserves are the biggest threat to whanau and hapu implementing Mataitai or Taiapure, the only tools we have to preserve those tauranga ika enjoyed by our Matua, Tupuna. When Ministry were quizzed on whether Taiapure and Mataitai were counted within the coastal space DoC are trying to lock down.

TOP

Conclusion

I want to close by leaving you with a summary of points I have raised in the body of my korero as points for us to ponder as we seek to better understand and provide Kaitiakitanga ki nga tamariki a Tangaroa.

  1. The law is clear; Section 8 (1)-The purpose of this Act is to provide for the utilisation of fisheries resources while ensuring sustainability. In many fisheries this is not the case. SNA8, GMU1.
    1. An interest in the effects of fishing on the aquatic environment in the area concerned – and have particular regard to Kaitiakitanga. Have Ministry provided for real input and participation to any iwi in Aotearoa? I don't think so.
  1. Section 13, clearly the law directs that fisheries be managed at or above Bmsy. SNA8, GMU1.
  2. Maori have substantial interests in all three categories of fishing. Commercial, customary and most of all recreational. On the 23 September 1992, the introduction of Te Tiriti O Waitangi (Fisheries Settlement) Act 1992, fishing as Maori knew it, changed forever There is no debate here!
  3. Maori commercial fishing interests have been addressed through the Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992. Unlike pakeha, Maori are strapped in to their commercial fishing interests.
  4. 99.99% of the time Maori go fishing to feed the whanau, they are categorised as recreational fishers. Let us protect this most important aspect of our fishing interests.
  5. Ministry have introduced a Proportional Allocation process which will kick of in June. They have met with Pakeha over the preparation of this paper but I am unaware of any approaches to Maori. If this passes into legislation-the impact will be huge as the Foreshore and Seabed legislation we witnessed last year. Not only for Maori, but for the public at large.
  6. Marine Reserves are not conducive to increasing the number of fish left in the water and this is a major threat to the implementation of our customary tools.

 

Not surprisingly, when Ngapuhi are quizzed about the priority placed on the three categories of our fishing interests, commercial interests inevitably come last. One typical comment is, "we want kai on our tables before any Chinese, Japanese or anyone else. Certainly before exporting for crayfish bait to Australia."

Hands up those of us here who think commercial should take priority over everything else? Or customary for that matter?

We need to wake up before all that is meaningful to us as Maori are consumed into the mainstream and we lose our status as Tangata Whenua. Our people are so supportive, feeding them with the right information and following good process will ensure they continue to follow and support us as their leaders.

 

Mauri Ora 

Raniera T (Sonny) Tau

Chairman Te Runanga A Iwi O Ngapuhi .

« « « Back to Page One

TOP

site designed by axys © 2003 option4. All rights reserved.