![Promote kahawai.co.nz](images/gr_promote.gif)
| ![](images/spacer.gif) |
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Three
Years of Kahawai Challenge
Kahawai Challenge team
August
2008
|
Kahawai
Legal Challenge Update New Zealand Fishing News
September
2008 edition |
|
|
|
|
|
By
August 27th the Olympic Games will be a memory and we will
either be basking in the glory of our fine athletes’
achievements or dreaming of what could have been. For the
Kahawai Challenge team the action continues.
An application has been lodged with the Supreme Court seeking
permission to appeal against the recent Court of Appeal’s
kahawai decision, and legal submissions have now been filed
in support with the Supreme Court. Wednesday 27th is the
last day for any of the parties involved to file submissions
in response to that application. There has been no indication
so far of how the fishing corporates will respond.
It will then be up to the Supreme Court to decide whether
leave is granted. There is no automatic right to appeal
and the Supreme Court’s decision is final.
|
|
Supreme
Court application
If
leave is granted the Supreme Court will specify the grounds
for appeal. These tend to be narrow legal questions. The
Hesketh Henry legal team are working with Alan Galbraith
QC to refine those arguments.
The
key question in the application for leave to appeal is how
the purpose in section 8 of the Fisheries Act 1996 to "enable
people to provide for their social, economic, and cultural
well-being" is to apply to the exercise of the Minister's
discretion under section 21 when making decisions to allow
for recreational fishing interests in the context of setting
the TACC (total allowable commercial catch). |
Earlier
Court decisions
In
the March 2007 High Court judgement Justice Harrison found
that in allowing for recreational interests the Minister
did not correctly apply the purpose of the Act of enabling
people "to provide for their social, economic and
cultural well-being" and that this was a mandatory
consideration when allowing for recreational interests
in fish stocks.
The
Court of Appeal rejected the emphasis in the High Court
judgement on the peoples’ well-being when making
decisions under the Fisheries Act.
The Supreme Court application has been pursued because
the correct approach to statutory interpretation is a
matter of general or public importance that will affect
not only kahawai but is also relevant to all other fish
stocks of interest to non-commercial fishers.
|
|
![](images/pseine2a1.jpg)
|
Why
the Challenge?
For
years non-commercial fishing representatives fielded calls
from people nationwide with similar complaints of less fish
available inshore and their inability to catch fish of a
reasonable size to feed their families.
Clearly hook-and-line fishing could not compete
with industrial fishing techniques.
There is certainly no competition when spotter planes can
be deployed to hunt down surface schooling fish and then
direct purse seiners to those areas to scoop them up.
It was the last straw for many representatives when the
Minister announced his management decisions for kahawai
in 2004.
Instead
of acknowledging the adverse impact that years of industrial
fishing had taken on both the environment and catch rates,
the Minister agreed to a catch limit for all interest groups
and then reduced those limits by 15 percent. |
|
This
proportional reduction caused an uproar amongst amateur
fishers. But worse was to come! |
|
In
2005 the Minister reviewed kahawai again and applied another
proportional reduction, this time applying a 10 percent
cut.
After seeking legal advice the NZ Big Game and Recreational
Fishing Councils and option4 agreed to mount a challenge.
Judicial review proceedings were lodged with the High Court
in August 2005. Bolstering this effort was the unprecedented
support of Maori. Our largest iwi joined in and their Chairman,
Raniera (Sonny) Tau, signed an affidavit on behalf of 120,000
Ngapuhi.
Rebuilding kahawai numbers and improving catch rates was
not the only objective. It was also important to clarify
how the Minister ought to make future decisions, particularly
in fisheries that are important to non-commercial fishers.
|
|
Achievements
This
effort would not have been possible without the total commitment
of the NZ Big Game Fishing Council and its clubs. Just recently
another $1000 cheque arrived from the Whangamata Ocean Sports
Club. Glorious.
You
can also contribute, please:
-
-
Dial 0900 KAHAWAI (0900 52 42 92) to automatically donate $20
via your phone account
-
Contact Trish Rea on 0800 KAHAWAI (0800 52 42 92) for larger
amounts.
-
Cheques
to the ‘Kahawai Challenge Fund’ can be sent to New
Zealand Fishing News, PO Box 12-965, Penrose, Auckland.
|
|