Minister
accepts High Court kahawai decision
Kahawai Challenge team
August
2007
|
Kahawai
Legal Challenge Update New Zealand Fishing News
September
2007 edition |
|
A
surprising revelation was made during the July stay application
hearing in the Auckland High Court. Crown Law, representing
the Minister and Ministry of Fisheries, advised that the
Minister had accepted the High Court's judgment made in
March 2007.
This
is welcome news for everyone supporting the Kahawai Legal
Challenge. |
In March, Justice Rhys Harrison found that the previous Minister’s
decisions for kahawai were flawed. The Minister was directed to
make fresh decisions taking into account the matters raised by
the High Court.
The outcome of the judicial review of the Minister’s 2004
and 2005 kahawai decisions was a ‘win’ for our fisheries
and all New Zealanders as it confirmed that sustainability is
the bottom line and must be the Minister’s ultimate objective.
July Hearing
The most
recent hearing occurred because the Ministry of Fisheries (MFish),
supported by the fishing industry, applied to the High Court for
a stay – to not implement the findings - of the High Court
decision pending the outcome of the appeal scheduled for the 26th
and 27th February 2008.
Crown Law accepted that the issues now before the Appeal Court
were important, saying:
“...
they go to the heart of decision-making regarding the setting
of TAC's, TACC's and recreational allowances. They apply to all
fisheries in which there is a recreational component, and to all
fisheries in the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park regardless of whether
there is a recreational component”.
Hearing Decision
On July
11th the High Court ordered that further decision making on kahawai
catch limits for recreational and commercial fishers will remain
“frozen” until the outcome of the appeal. This means
the kahawai total allowable catches (TACs), recreational allowances
and total allowable commercial catches (TACCs) are not likely
to change until late 2008 at the earliest.
March 2007 Decision
March
21st 2007 will always be remembered as the day all New Zealanders
received recognition of their non-commercial fishing rights.
The High Court confirmed that:
-
every
man, woman and child in this country has a well settled common
law right to fish to provide for their needs; and
-
this
right is particularly valuable because of our close proximity
to the sea and temperate climate, both factors that contribute
to the popularity of fishing.
The Minister’s
statutory obligations
The Fisheries Act 1996 directs the Minister to provide for the
sustainable utilisation of our fisheries.
First the Minister must set a total allowable catch limit (TAC).
This is about sustainability of our fisheries.
Next when setting or varying the total allowable catch (TACC)
the Minister has a statutory obligation to ‘allow for’:
-
non-commercial
(both customary and recreational) catch; and
-
fish
killed during the process of fishing known as ‘other mortality’.
This rate varies depending on the particular fishery (snapper
or crayfish) and/or fishing method.
This is about utilisation
of our fisheries.
Once these non-commercial and mortality allowances have been set
the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) can be established.
Non-commercial
fishing rights must be allowed for
The decision of the High Court makes it clear that whilst it is
open to the Minister to set the TACC at zero, not so the allowance
for recreational fishers.
If non-commercial interests exist in a fishery then both customary
and recreational interests must be provided for, before a TACC
is set.
In summary, setting the TAC is about sustainability, and setting
the TACC is about utilisation, namely, the use of the fish available
after non-commercial fishing interests and mortality have been
taken into account and ‘allowed for’.
Clearly the High Court agreed with submissions from the Kahawai
Challenge legal team [Alan Galbraith QC, Lyn Stevens QC before
him and Stuart Ryan from Hesketh Henry Lawyers] that the Minister
was not fully or objectively informed by his Ministry of his obligations
to ensure sustainable utilisation, and that the advice MFish gave
him “screwed the scrum”.
Appeal Court Hearing
Having
achieved a great success in the first round before the High Court,
the importance of the case before the Appeal Court gives added
push to the fundraising efforts to meet the expected legal costs
of defending the first High Court decision.
Around $80,000 is required to meet the cost of legal representation
in the Court of Appeal. If you want to protect this historic win
and your children’s future right to ‘fish for a feed’
please do one of the following:
-
-
Dial
0900 KAHAWAI (0900 52 42 92) and automatically donate $20 via
your phone account
-
For
larger amounts please contact Jo Harris on 0800 KAHAWAI (0800
52 42 92).
-
Cheques
made out to the ‘Kahawai Challenge Fund’ can be
sent to the team via New Zealand Fishing News, PO Box 12-965,
Penrose, Auckland.
To
people who have already invested in your fishing future, well
done. Thanks too for the great letters, the team appreciates your
support and rousing sentiments. After achieving this much we have
no plans to stop, your contributions will be put to good use.
|