Initial
View on Kahawai IPP
NZ
Big Game Fishing Council
Ministry
Propose Quotas for Kahawai
- The Ministry of Fisheries (MFish) have distributed the Initial
Position Paper (IPP) proposing recreational, customary and commercial
catch limits for 19 species including kahawai, swordfish, yellowfin
tuna and mako shark. These species have been gazetted for introduction
to the Quota Management System (QMS) on 1 October 2004. This is
a brief summary of the kahawai proposal and issues. We have until
27 February 2004 to prepare submissions.
NZBGFC Kahawai Policy
- The Recreational Fishing Council and NZ Big Game Fishing Council
have had a policy for several years that kahawai should be managed
as a recreational only species. The Minister decided last year
that kahawai will be introduced to the QMS and the following Quota
Management Areas (QMAs).
Figure 1: Quota Management Areas
for kahawai.
-
The Ministry have used average catch information
over the last 5 years (and some arbitrary guesses of customary
harvest) to recommend the allowance for each sector. They
present only one option.
TOP
Figure
2: Proposed allocation in tonnes:
QMA
|
Customary
Allowance |
Recreational
Allowance |
Other
Mortality |
Commercial
TACC |
Total
TAC |
KAH 1 |
790 |
1580 |
60 |
1480 |
3910 |
KAH 2 |
255 |
510 |
35 |
710 |
1510 |
KAH 3 |
150 |
300 |
20 |
490 |
960 |
KAH 4 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
KAH 8 |
190 |
380 |
5 |
635 |
1210 |
KAH 10 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
Totals |
1391 |
2780 |
120 |
3335 |
7626 |
- MFish say that the importance of kahawai to recreational and
customary fishers supports the need for caution when setting catch
limits.
- There is no change to amateur bag limits or introduction of
size limit proposed.
Issues with the MFish allowances:
- Setting the TAC by adding up what each sector has been catching
implies that MFish is happy with the current management in this
fishery. This is not the view of recreational or customary fishers.
There is still an obvious decline in school kahawai in many areas.
- MFish does not see any need for reallocation of catch from one
sector to another based on kahawais high recreational value and
low commercial value.
- The recreational harvest estimates are based on the average
of the 1996 and 2000 (or 2001) national surveys. Fundamental errors
in the 1996 survey have recently lead MFish to conclude that the
1996 results should not be used and that the 2000 and 2001 surveys
provide the best estimates.
- In fisheries of importance to customary Maori fishers it is
MFish policy to set the customary allowance as equal to the recreational
allowance. This is a very important customary fishery but 2800
tonnes looked a bit big so the customary allocation is half of
the recreational estimates.
- For 3 of the 5 years used in setting the commercial TACC in
KAH1 the purse seine catch limit of 1200 tonnes has been exceeded.
This excess catch was illegal and should not be counted.
TOP
Issues with the kahawai fishery
- The fishing industry may claim extra allocation by arguing
for an extension of the qualifying years into the mid or early
1990s. But catches in the most recent fishing years have been
down. Sanfords annual report comments on the downturn in the Australian
crayfish fishery resulting in less demand for kahawai.
- The fishing industry has said that it is uneconomic to steam
too far to catch kahawai. This is why most of the catch comes
from the western Bay of Plenty. The average port price for commercially
landed kahawai is quoted in the MFish paper is 43c per kg. The
year before it was 34c per kg.
- The Minister must be asked to consider what fishery maximises
the benefit to the nation – purse seiners full of crayfish
bait for Australia or a rebuild of the recreational and customary
fisheries.
- Local depletion is a concern in areas where the kahawai fishing
is concentrated. The QMS is not good at dealing with local depletion
issues. Requiring fishing effort to be spread may prevent local
depletion and make it harder to fill low value orders.
- The voluntary agreements that that restrict how close to shore
the purse seiners can fish and to avoid targeting kahawai in the
western Bay of Plenty in the summer months should be retained.
- Kahawai used to be one of the most accessible fish to recreational
fishers. It can be found in most inshore habitats: reef; beach;
estuary; and harbours. It is great for kids learning how to fish
and is an important part of the diet in many coastal communities.
It is the people’s fish.
- Kahawai has a high value as part of our natural environment.
It is one of the few species that can form impressive surface
schools. They drive krill and small fish to the surface so are
have an important interaction with terns and other sea birds,
while kahawai themselves are an important food source for larger
predators. Surely it is good for NZ to see a return of the kahawai
schools on our coast.
TOP
What we need to do
- We need people who fish, and clubs and organisations that represent
them, to reply to the Minister. Tell him why kahawai is important
to you and how you would like the fishery to be in the future.
- Ask him why is this valuable resource being exported at rock
bottom prices when our recreational and customary kahawai fisheries
are in trouble.
- Ask him why the Ministry of Fisheries has not offered any management
option other than continuing current catch tonnages in the quota
system.
- Keep in touch with recreational groups who will be working hard
on this issue.
Read the full details on the kahawai IPP, related documents and
submission details here »
TOP |