Response
to Keith Ingram Article
Original press release from NZRFC tabled by Bob Burstall. Little editing
other than inadvertent editors error of according it to byline of
Keith Ingram rather than that of NZRFC. Grant Dixon (Editor of Fishing
News) explained the mechanics of the editorial process and subsequent
editing.
The option4 team are agreed that the contents of the original press
release are clumsy and unfortunate.
However, we are clear that the real task is securing the right. Option4
does not need or want the baggage of an exchange with NZRFC in a public
forum.
In many respects this is "straw that breaks camels back"
stuff i.e. an accumulation of subtle and not so subtle slights from
NZRFC.
Agreed to respond directly to NZRFC. Straighten up the factual aspects
of the press release. Fishing News editorial has some responsibility
to straighten up the play. The depth of feeling evident at this and
last weeks meetings is self evident.
Boat Show
Message
We need a clear simple message
Eftpos - in hand
Banner - Paul will organise
Printing - Paul has taken this on.
Donation box - Thankyou Trish and Mark
Schedule of equipment
· Table, carpeted available
· Computer with site preloaded - to be delivered on set up
day
· NZBGFC has ordered an identical computer set up
Lucky Dip
prizes to be delivered to:-
Paul's Fishing Kites
39a Neilson Street, Onehunga
Most of the wholesalers spoken to to date have been supportive with
contributions for prizes.
Talk Back
Campaign
Inform, not inflame.
Paul will have list of key points to make by Thursday.
Option4 submission
replies from Ministry
Is there a case for us to go to the Ombudsman or the State Services
Commissioner or both to bring the issue of determining whether or
not the option4 submitters are entitled to a reply from the Ministry
of Fisheries as promised in the Soundings document.
Legal advise on this issue is being sought.
Before the RWG Report and Independent Reviewers Analysis are sent
however these need to be straightened up.
Participation
in Cooperative Management Forums
Fisheries Management Planning Processes appear almost pre-emptive
that we have a proportional share as per options 2 and 3. Kim Drummond
is keen to talk with us regards the planning process being proposed
by Ministry. It would appear that we are to be forced to be cooperative.
It is all part of the devolution process. The Ministry wants us
to sort it out amongst ourselves i.e. stakeholders. This would depend
on some sort of proportional share scenario.
Fundraising
Why raise funds?
They ignore us now. If we stand still they will continue to ignore
us. The answer is growth and plenty of it. Steady growth costs money.
Short term funding is required to establish long term sustainable
funding. The funding we need is to get the right in place which
will lead to appropriate funding being put in place.
Next Meeting
- This Friday 18/5/01 - 7.00 pm - Scott's place.
Meeting closed
- 9.45
|