Agenda:
- Core Groups
- Ministerial
Advisory Group
- Working/
Focus Group - sub committees
- option4
Fun Day
Core Groups
There was some discussion amongst the group as to whether or not
there was a need for a core or inner group. Paul Barnes explained
that the main objective of a smaller group was originally to prevent
any further lapses where option4 discussions on topics were leaking
to the public and other organisations prior to becoming option4
policy. Core groups have also proved useful where urgent decisions
need to be made on confidential information, the discussions on
the last meeting with the Minister while the minutes were in draft
form is an example of this
It was decided
by the group that there are occassions when a small group is required
but should be an exception rather than the rule. The key focus of
option4 has been, and continues to be, open and transparent communication
with the public.
Bill Ross tabled comments to the meeting via email regarding his
belief that there was a need for more frequent option4 meetings
and less emails. It was decided and agreed upon by the group that
option4 will meet on the regular basis of the first and third Friday
of each month.
After a brief
discussion there was full agreement on the importance of keeping
all option4 members and supporters informed by way of email so
that, although meetings are held in Auckland, all members have the
opportunity to address issues (by proxy) at the meetings by way
of email or fax.
To this end
it was agreed that all option4 members should ensure they each
have the same full and complete list of all members¹ email
addresses to enable everyone to receive the same information.
PLEASE UPDATE
YOU LIST ACCORDINGLY
The following
is Pauls list
Paul and Peggy
Barnes kites@ihug.co.nz
Kim Walshe kwalshe@attglobal.net
Scott Macindoe scott@wilmac.co.nz
Geoff Green ggreen@tradermags.co.nz
Bill Ross bookstimesthree@xtra.co.nz
Ray Everson kelston@pitstop.co.nz
Bill Cooke and Dianne Osullivan ppv@xtra.co.nz
John Holdsworth johnno@igrin.co.nz
Tony Orman orman.riversedge@xtra.co.nz
Allan Mountain <datavoice@clear.net.nz>
Keith Ingram keith@skipper.co.nz
Bob Burstall rtb@ihug.co.nz
John E Fishing News <johne@fishnz.co.nz>
Fred Cooke <fredio54@hotmail.com>
Geoff Romeril <Romeril@attglobal.net>
Graham Ellis graham.j.ellis@xtra.co.nz
Grant Dixon grant.dixon@fishnz.co.nz
Lindsay(Web designer) lindsay@axys.co.nz
Roy Arnold roy.diane.arnold@xtra.co.nz
webfax@nzsouth.co.nz
club.wingatui@xtra.co.nz
brian@brians.co.nz
mahumarine@xtra.co.nz
nover@xtra.co.nz
jbyron@ihug.co.nz
John Chibnall jchib@xtra.co.nz
martinb@supalite.co.nz
Bill Kirk <willekirk@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Bob Burstall bob@tesa.co.nz
Trish Rea trea@xtra.co.nz
If your email
address appears above and does not have a name to the left of it,
could you please forward details so we all know who we are talking
to.
Have you
any other names or organizations you feel should be put onto the
option4 list? Are any redundant?
Ministerial
Advisory Group
There was a
great deal of discussion surrounding the proposal by the Minister
for option4 to become involved in a Ministerial Advisory Group.
Points of clarification regarding this Advisory Group as already
flagged by the Minister at our last meeting were:
1. Approximately 3 or 4 option4 members would be required on this
Advisory Group.
2. The Advisory Group would report directly to the Minister of Fisheries.
3. The Advisory Group would only consist of recreational representatives.
4. The Minister of Fisheries would be responsible for consulting
with Commercial and Maori.
emails on the
topic were read.
From Bill
Kirk
Hi Paul and Peggy,
As I see
it, admittedly from a long way away, option4 has two great strengths.
First, it has uncluttered aims. Secondly, it has a great deal of
public support.
The dangers in becoming involved in committees and working groups
are also twofold:
there is the prospect that options4's four points of principle might
become compromised or diluted, and there is a very real threat of
going native.
By that, I mean unwittingly falling under the spell of officials
and others whose motives are not ours. One of the oldest tricks
in the repertoire is to absorb individuals or groups who are dangerous
and make them part of an amorphous body which, over time, is shuffled
in the right direction - MoF's.
It is clear that that is what happened with the RFC, though it has
to be said that some members of the Council were all ready inclined
that way, having sniffed the possibility of money and increased
status. Not that they were ever going to get them.
The other factor in what we might call the downfall of the RFC was
defeatism. There were siren voices, almost from Day One, saying
that the Council was too small, underfunded and undermanned to stand
up to the Industry, particularly when it (the Industry) had the
backing of MoF.
With the strength of individuals like yourselves, Kim and Bill Cooke,
and the wholehearted support and skills of Grant, Geoff and John
in the media, there is little danger of option4 going native. And
I am sure the message will not become diluted, particularly if you
resist pressure to expand and/or make the organisation more complicated.
My messaage is rather like Tony Orman's: keep it simple, keep it
strong and do all you can to rally support. Join the Ministers's
advisory group by all means, but KISSand beware the Stockholm Syndrome.
Yours ever
Bill
PS Wish there
was more I could do.
From Tony
Orman
Hi Paul and
Scott, Just back after a week in Norfolk. Skim reading 70
messages on e mail (!!!) and re advisory group, a few points:-
- Advisory
groups are toothless tigers altho if the Minister doesn't
listen, he's in for a public roasting
- I would
be reluctant to see Option4 represented directly as it
compromises Option4, just as Rec FC was, but we could nominate
two or three
stressing they are there as individuials and not representing
Option4
directly
- Agree
with Grant's comment too.
- Surely
its not too hard for govt to define public's right in law? That's
our one and only goal at moment.
- Is an
adviosory group stalling for time and procrastination by MoF
bureaicrats?
Will get back up to speed cheers Tony
Scott Macindoe
stressed the point that the purpose of option4 is to enshrine the
4 principles and to define the rights of the public to harvest seafood.
option4 does not have a mandate to become involved in the management
issues by way of regional or national structures without the right
being defined first.
Kim Walshe
suggested that a decision should not be made without Terms of Reference.
Kim stated that it is imperative to ensure that we play on a level
playing field and if the Ministerial Advisory Group is not run to
our satisfaction we could opt out of it.
Diane O¹Sullivan
stated that the Advisory Group was good chance to establish a relationship
with the Minister and to make changes from the inside.
It was agreed
by the group that a letter will be drafted to the Minister by Paul
Barnes and Kim Walshe setting out the Terms of Reference. This letter
will be sent to all option4 members with an urgent response request
as to:
1. Should option4 be involved in the Ministerial Advisory Group
2. Should the letter be sent to the Minister
Working / Focus Groups
Diane O¹Sullivan
suggested the need for focused working groups within option4 with
set tasks. For example: Media, Money, Membership, Maori, Minister,
M.P¹s and Ministry. (Option4 has more mmmmmm?)
Everyone agreed
that there was a real need for option4 members to become more involved
in the above issues and sub committees could work independently
on these issues and then report back on their progress to the group
at the meetings.
Within the
group of members attending the meeting the following have volunteered
for sub committees:
Media - Geoff
Romerall
(option4 Updates, Press Releases, Radio)
M.P¹s -
Diane O¹Sullivan, Bill Cooke, Kim Walshe
(Polling M.P.¹s for support of option4)
Money - Scott
Macindoe
(Raising funds for option4)
Maori - Paul
Barnes, Scott Macindoe
(Raising support and awareness through Maori M.P¹s and Urban
Maori)
Membership -
It was determined that this particular issue involved a great deal
of time and database management experience. There was a lot of discussion
regarding membership and the possible need for funding of someone
to take on this role.
It was decided
by the group to consult with option4 via email and request help
with this matter. Can anyone who was not at the meeting assist on
any of these subcomittees, those with exrerience with politicians
and media please stick you hands up.
The above focus
groups will be required to work within time lines and deadlines
and report back to the option4 group meetings. Anyone wishing to
assist on any of the above can contact Scott Macindoe.
Fun Day
Bill Ross has
suggested an option4 fun day for us all to get together for some
time out.All in favour say AYE, Unaimous AYE! In order to select
a time most agreeable to all it was suggested that a list of available
dates over the next 6 weeks be supplied to Peggy Barnes.
The next
option4 meeting will be held:
Friday April
6, 2001
10:00 am - 12:00 pm
N.Z. Fishing News
274 Church Street
Penrose
|