Implementation of Legal Protection: Marine
Areas Heritage Protection
Implementation of Legal Protection
Pages 307 – 318 inclusive
The establishment and management of marine reserves
and other marine protected areas through statutory provisions administered
by the Department. See also Marine Mammals chapter on page 287.
There is a strong interest from many sectors of the community in
the establishment of a comprehensive network of marine protected
areas around the coast of New Zealand. The purpose of the network
is to ensure, as far as possible, the preservation of representative
samples of all classes of marine ecosystems, both typical and unique.
Together these give New Zealand its own recognisable character.
Marine ecosystems include all species of marine flora and fauna
and their habitats.
Legislation/ Maori Practices
A number of statutes and traditional Maori resource management
practices can provide for the protection of all or significant portions
of the marine environment. These are administered by a range of
agencies and authorities – the Department of Conservation,
the Ministry of Agriculture and fisheries, Regional Councils and
Iwi. Each practice and piece of legislation has a different purpose,
and it is important to consider which will be most appropriate and
effective when proposing protection of a given marine areas or resource.
Marine protected areas where protected status is considered appropriate.
The Department administers the Marine Reserves Act 1971, the Reserves
Act 1977, the Conservation Act 1987, and the Marine Mammal Protection
Act 1978, all of which can be used to protect marine values.
The Marine Reserves Act 1971 states as its purpose “…this
Act shall have effect for the purpose of preserving, as marine reserves
for the scientific study of marine life, areas of New Zealand that
contain underwater scenery, natural features, or marine life, of
such distinctive quality, or so typical or beautiful, or unique,
that their continued preservation is in the national interest”.
Section 3.2(d) states “Subject to the provisions of the Act
and to the imposition of such conditions and restrictions as may
be necessary for the preservation of marine life or for the welfare
in general of the reserves, the public shall have freedom of access
and entry to the reserves, so that they may enjoy in full measure
the opportunity to study, observe and record marine life in its
natural habitat.
A marine reserve may or may not abut the land.
Amateur fishing is provided for in terms of Section 3(3) of the
Act, whereby the Minister of Conservation by notice in the Gazette
may authorise any person(s) to undertake the activity. However,
no fishing is allowed in the two marine reserves in the Auckland
Conservancy. For any new marine reserve proposal, fishing, other
than by commercial fishers, may be provided for in terms of Section
5(9) of the Act by way of a condition of the Order in Council in
cases where this is warranted.
In addition to the Director General of Conservation, the following
organisations and authorities may apply for a marine reserve to
be established:
- universities under the Universities Act 1961;
- any body appointed to administer land where it has frontage
to the sea coast, under the Reserves Act 1977;
- any incorporated society or body corporate engaged in or having
an objective of scientific study of marine lief or natural history.
It is the Department’s function to process all applications.
Protection of intertidal (foreshore) areas, vested in the Crown,
can be achieved by setting an area apart as a reserve subject to
the Reserves Act. It also provides for the extension of the boundaries
of an existing reserve to mean low water springs. The Reserves Act
provides for similar levels of protection to the marine reserves
Act, but the provisions only extend over the foreshore, down to
mean low water springs. In terms of s.49 of the Act, the Minister
of Conservation may allow any qualified person to take specified
specimens of animal or plant for scientific or education purposes
from any reserve. However, no animal or plant can be removed or
destroyed for any other purpose, including fishing, unless authorised.
Any Crown foreshore area may be declared to be subject to the Conservation
Act and held for conservation purposes in order for the habitats
to be protected. The level of protection given to plants and animals
within such an areas may vary, and activities such as fishing are
not automatically excluded. If an activity is not damaging or likely
to damage protected habitats or other features within the area under
Conservation Act status, then it is unlikely to be prohibited.
The Marine Mammals Protection Act provides for the protection of
marine mammals, which may include the establishment of marine sanctuaries
(see page 287 for more information on this Act).
The Resource Management Act 1991 provides opportunities for the
Department to become involved in statutory planning processes as
they relate to the coastal marine area (refer to Statutory Planning
and Coastal Policies chapters on pages 319 and 325). The purpose
of the Act is to ensure sustainable management of the natural and
physical environment, however, within the coastal marine area, sustainable
management applies to all coastal resources except fisheries. Regional
councils, with powers and responsibilities under the Resource Management
Act 1991, must prepare regional coastal plans for the coastal marine
area.
The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries administers the Fisheries
Act 1983, which provides for the management of marine plant and
animal species, and for the establishment of taiapure – local
fishery areas. The Ministry also administers the Treaty of Waitangi
(Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992 which provides for mataitai
reserves to be established.
Taiapure are provided for in the Maori Fisheries Act 1989, which
amended the Fisheries Act. Taiapure are local fishery areas, in
estuarine or littoral coastal waters which are of special significance
to a particular iwi or hapu (either as a source of food or for spiritual
or cultural reasons). The objective of the taiapure legislation
is to provide for better recognition of rangatiratanga and of the
right secured in relation to fisheries in Article II of the Treaty
of Waitangi.
Mataitai reserves are areas of traditional importance to tangata
whenua. Maori reserves have been recognised in law since the 1870’s.
The Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act both enables
the establishment of fishing reserves and recognises the rights
of iwi to manage these.
In both taiapure and mataitai reserves, any regulations need to
be approved by the Ministry of Fisheries before implementation,
must apply equally to all people, Maori and non-Maori, and must
be consistent with sustainable management. In a mataitai reserve
the committee is able to approve harvesting for marae purposes,
even when the reserve is closed to all other harvesting. Traditional
Maori views on fisheries and their management are being translated
into practice by increasing use of traditional resource management
practices such as rahui. Rahui can be understood as a temporary
tapu to prohibit particular activities. Several forms are still
prevalent. One form prohibits people from gathering food in an area
for a specified period after a drowning. This prohibition is designed
to separate people from the contaminated water and its products.
The other main form of rahui is concerned with the conservation
of species through prohibitions on the harvest of kaimoana.
Existing Protection
The Auckland Conservancy administers two marine reserves at time
of publication. The Cape Rodney-Okakari Point Marine Reserve near
Leigh is New Zealand’s first and premier marine reserve, established
in 1975.
The Kermadec Islands Marine Reserve was established in 1990, and
lies approximately 1000km northeast of Auckland. It is an area of
international significance, containing New Zealand’s only
true subtropical marine ecosystem, and is the second largest protected
area administered by the Department, after Fiordland National Park.
Some foreshore (intertidal) areas are also protected under the
Reserves Act. The nature reserves of the Kermadec Islands, Mokohinau
Islands and Little Barrier Island protect all marine life above
mean low water springs. The mangrove and estuarine foreshore of
the Tauhoa Scientific Reserve in the Kaipara Harbour are also protected
under the Reserves Act.
The Tawharanui Marine Park protects an area of foreshore, seabed
and coastal waters to 800 metres from mean high water springs on
the northern coast of the Takatu Peninsula, and 200 metres from
mean high water springs on the southern side. The area is managed
by the Auckland Regional Council under bylaws made under the Harbours
Act 1950. It is anticipated that these bylaws will be replaced where
appropriate, by regional rules in the regional coastal plan. The
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries administers Fisheries Act
regulations which prohibit the taking of any marine life. In 1981,
when the Marine Park was established, the Ministry published special
fisheries restrictions which prohibited fishing on most of the northern
side of the peninsula; however fishing is still allowed on the southern
side.
Rahui have been imposed by local iwi at Karekare, Long Bay, Eastern
and Cheltenham Beaches to protect shellfish beds. These beaches
have also been closed for the taking of shellfish under section
85 of the Fisheries Act 1983 for a two year period. Such use of
the Fisheries Act provides a means for rahui to be recognised in
law.
Marine reserve applications are being processed for areas around
Pollen Island in the Upper Waitemata Harbour and the Long Bay/ Okura
River area on Auckland’s East Coast Bays. The Department is
also investigating a marine reserve proposal for the northeastern
coast of Great Barrier Island.
The character of the Auckland marine environment
The character of the Auckland Conservancy is derived from its intricate
coastal setting and its marine environments. In the north, the isolated
mid-oceanic Kermadec Islands rise sharply above the Kermadec Trench,
one of the deepest submarine features on earth. This complex biologically
rich area, intermediately placed between temperate mainland New
Zealand waters and subtropical Tongan waters is fully protected
to the limit of New Zealand’s territorial sea (12 nautical
miles) by the Kermadec Marine Reserve.
Mainland northeastern New Zealand coastal waters are affected peripherally
by warm oceanic currents which cross the northern Tasman Sea from
eastern Australia to merge with colder southern waters. On the west,
colder currents from the southern Tasman Sea sweep close to the
New Zealand coast. The mainland Auckland Conservancy presents bold
faces to these oceanic influences along outer Barrier Islands and
the West Coast. On both the east and West Coasts, these powerful
oceanic currents confront rocky coasts. On each coast, the waters
penetrate deeply into the region, producing dramatic contrasts with
the outer exposed coasts, as every variety of sheltered, open, hard
and soft marine environments receive the waters. In the heart of
Auckland, the coastal waters from east and west almost meet, and
play a major role in determining the geography of the metropolitan
area, while their diurnal ebb and flow combine to affect its mild
maritime climate.
To the east, the broad expanse of the Hauraki Gulf provides a relatively
sheltered marine environment without parallel in New Zealand. Along
its coasts are repeating patterns of rocky shores and headlands
and sandy bays, interrupted by small shallow estuaries at river
and stream mouths. At the head of the Gulf, the waters from the
Waitemata Harbour on the west, and in the southeast the broad Firth
of Thames.
On the West Coast, the confronting barriers of rock and sand are
broken only at the narrow Manukau and Kaipara Harbour entrances,
both of which open out into large shallow harbours edged by the
detailed and intricate pattern of a drowned coastline with some
bolder headlands and cliffs, with sandy beaches, deeply penetrating
estuaries and broad muddy intertidal flats.
Developing a marine protected area network
To be truly representative of the diversity of marine ecosystems
and features of the Auckland Conservancy, a network of marine protected
areas needs to include:
- Examples of each of the main types of marine ecosystems found
in the Conservancy. Ideally, the network will include the best
typical example of each of the different classes of marine ecosystem
described in Table 9.
- A range of marine ecosystems which together capture the overall
character of the Auckland Conservancy’s marine environment,
and its richness and diversity. This may mean it is desirable
to protect several different areas within one particular “class”
of marine ecosystem.
- Special or unique marine ecosystems or features found within
the Conservancy.
![](images/gbacms1.gif)
Achieving representativeness
To help distinguish the different types of marine ecosystem found
in the Conservancy, a classification system has been developed.
Table 9 summarises the main classes of marine environment which
contribute to the character of the Auckland Conservancy and which
distinguish it from other parts of New Zealand.
Any simple scheme to capture the diversity and richness of marine
environment in Auckland will have inadequacies. However, three major
characteristics have been distinguished – biogeography, wave
exposure and substratum type.
Biogeography refers to the character, patterns and distribution
of different physical and biological elements of marine ecosystems.
In addition to the distinctive subtropical Kermadec area, Auckland
has distinctly different west and east coast marine ecosystems.
Wave exposure relates to the power of the sea, the length of fetch
and the size of the waves which can effect the marine environment,
both on the coast and out at sea. The two extremes of wave exposure
are represented by very wild and waveswept offshore areas, such
as the Mokohinau Islands, and the enclosed upper reaches of harbours,
such as Pollen Island in the Waitemata Harbour. Between these two
extremes is a continuum scale, but two intermediate stages are open
moderately wave-exposed coasts with a limited fetch or which are
only subject to very high wave conditions occasionally, typified
by Pakiri Beach, and the wave-protected coasts with very short fetch
and/or headlands or other deflectors of the wave energy, such as
Cheltenham Beach/ North Head.
Substratum type is a complex mixture of many factors, but a simple
distinction can be easily and readily made between hard (rocky)
foreshore and sea bed, such as Meola Reef, and soft (sand or mud)
foreshore and sea bed, such as the mangrove forests of the Kaipara
Harbour.
Consideration of these three characteristics provides a total of
16 different ecosystem combinations or classes.
To develop a comprehensive network of marine protected areas in
the Auckland Conservancy, it is desirable to protect at least one
example of each these 16 classes.
It may also be desirable to protect several areas within one particular
ecosystem category in order to capture the diversity and richness
of marine features found in the Conservancy.
Some sites are grouped together within an ecosystem class which
are recognisably quite different in character. For example under
the class of “east coast, wave sheltered, hard coasts”
are both the volcanic basalt foreshore rocks of Takapuna reef and
the Waitemata-series sedimentary, sandstone, wave-cut platform reefs
of Long Bay. Because these areas are of different hardness (sandstone
erodes much faster than basalt), colour (lighter coloured sandstone
holds heat differently to dark basalt) and shape (sandstone erodes
to a flat reef platform, whereas basalt retains its nooks and crannies)
the species found at each location are quite different.
Other areas such as the Weiti Spits, Te Tokaroa (Meola) Reef, Takapuna
Reef, and the Ihuamatao buried forests are important because they
provide unique records of geomorphologic processes which helped
shape the Auckland marine landscape.
In the case of northeast Motutapu, which is in the vicinity of
the Motutapu Outdoor Education Centre, the educational value of
a marine protected area would be of national significance.
The achievement of representativeness is likely to include the
protection of at least 10% of the coastal area and seas of each
biogeographic region which lies with the Auckland Conservancy boundary.
The adequacy of the representativeness of protected areas will need
to be monitored.
Selecting sites for marine protected area investigation
The main legal mechanisms the Department can use when seeking to
formally protect marine ecosystems are the Reserves Act, Conservation
Act and the Marine Reserves Act. With reference to Section 3 of
the Reserves Act, the meaning of ‘conservation’ as defined
in the Conservation Act, and Section 3(1) of the Marine Reserves
Act (see Appendix 20), the Department has developed a list of sites
it believes are the most significant in terms of their natural values,
using the following criteria:
![](images/gbacms2.gif)
Criteria
- Best typical example of each of the different classes of
ecosystem found in the Conservancy (using above classification
system)
- Representativeness of the diversity of the Conservancy’s
marine environment.
- Special or unique features present.
Information for site assessment has been derived from a range of
sources, including the Department’s Coastal Resource Inventory
(1990), the Marine Reserves Forum, and from submissions received
from the public on the Draft Conservation Management Strategy, Auckland
(1993). The Marine Reserves Forum, an initiative of communities
of interest in Auckland, advises the Department on matters relating
to marine protection. Members include central and regional agencies,
conservation organisations and user groups.
The statutory mechanism to be used to protect any areae would be
determined as part of any investigation.
The sites identified as warranting investigation for marine protected
status are shown in Table 9. It is not envisaged that the Department
will investigate all sites, and therefore further priorities need
to be established.
Priorities for investigation
Further criteria have been developed to help determine which of
these sites will be priority areas for investigation by the Department
over the next ten years. These criteria are primarily concerned
with degree of threat, achievability of establishing and looking
after a marine protected area, and the benefits to the wider community.
These criteria have been used as guides to determine the need for
urgency of action in investigating areas, and not all criteria are
necessarily met for any one priority site.
Further Criteria
1. High level of threat to natural values of the area by use
or change
2. Low cost/ high benefit of establishment of marine protected status
3. Impact on existing users
4. Marine area adjacent to land areas that are already protected
5. Level and ease of public access
6. Significant opportunities for recreational and educational use
and for interpretation of the values of the area
7. High level of community support
8. Achievable and cost-effective management, including compliance
and enforcement
9. Opportunities for scientific study
Consideration of the above criteria in relation to the sites identified
as warranting investigation has resulted in a list of ten areas
which the Department will investigate as a matter of priority. These
are detailed in implementation 41.1.2 and 41.1.3
NB The criteria on pages 311 and 314 can also provide a useful
guide for other agencies and organizations in assessing the desirability
of promoting the protection of any given marine area.
Marine Reserves Management
In terms of the Marine Reserves Act, the Department has responsibilities
to manage a marine reserve so as to protect the marine life and
its habitat, as well as to ensure the underwater scenery and natural
features of the area are preserved as far as possible in their natural
state. Other marine protected areas must also be managed in accordance
with the provisions of the Act under which they are protected.
While all marine protected areas have certain management requirements
in common, including compliance/ law enforcement, research, monitoring,
and educational advocacy, the emphasis will vary, depending upon
the area’s accessibility and particular constraints and opportunities
presented at each location. For example, the management requirements
of the Cape Rodney-Okakari Point Marine Reserve and the Kermadec
Marine Reserve are quite different.
The former, being just north of the Auckland urban area, is subject
to extensive scientific study as well as high recreational use by
both the general public and by commercial dive training schools.
More recently, a commercial glass bottom boat tourist operation
has begun to operate within the reserve.
Because of the variety of non-extractive uses and activities which
occur within this reserve, and which are generally undertaken by
different groups, (that is, the general public like to simply picnic,
walk on the beach and/ or snorkel/ swim in the reserve, whereas
dive club members prefer to only scuba dive), there is potential
for conflict between these competing uses. This particular management
issue is to be directly addressed as part of a joint University
of Auckland and Department of Conservation study on future management
options, and in the preparation of a proposed Conservation Management
Plan for this area. (Refer to Cape Rodney-Okakari Point/ Leigh chapter
on page 105).
In order to ensure illegal fishing activities are minimised, the
implementation of an effective compliance/ law enforcement programme
is essential. The terms ‘compliance’ and ‘law
enforcement’ whilst having similar connotations, do not mean
the same thing when used by the Department. ‘Compliance’
encompasses all of the activities, such as education programmes,
undertaken by the Department to encourage people to adhere to any
regulations, bylaws or offence provisions of Acts, rather than ‘break
the law’.
‘Law enforcement’ however, includes any legal action
taken by the Department aimed at trying to stop illegal activities.
Whilst the Department’s primary objective is to prevent an
offence being committed in the first instance, it will consider
recourse to legal action if any particular situation warrants it.
In addition to compliance/ law enforcement being undertaken by staff
and well trained honorary rangers, close liaison with the local
community and with Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries staff can
assist in prevention and detection of fishing or other illegal activities.
The Kermadec Marine Reserve in comparison with the Cape Rodney-Okakari
Point Reserve is both remote and vast and hence management requirements
are different. Here, special emphasis is placed on education programmes
to ensure that visitors are aware of the values of the reserve.
Because of the distance from New Zealand, the use of volunteer assistance
with compliance/ law enforcement is not feasible. Instead, close
liaison and cooperation with agencies such as Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries and the New Zealand Defence Force are important.
As scientific study is specifically provided for in terms of the
Marine Reserves Act, the Department has a responsibility to assess,
in accordance with the legislation, any applications submitted by
researchers. Scientists may also want to undertake study in other
marine protected areas. The assessment of such applications is undertaken
in accordance with the relevant legislation and Departmental guidelines.
The Department monitors marine protected areas for a variety of
reasons, such as tracking changes in the near-natural environment
of a marine reserve, or monitoring the impact of visitor use in
a marine reserve to be sure that any adverse effects are minimised.
Objectives
41.0.1 Create a network of up to 20 representative marine
protected areas within the Auckland Conservancy by the year 2005,
to contribute to the protection of representative samples of all
classes of marine landscapes and ecosystems, both typical and unique,
and which in its aggregate represents Auckland’s own distinctive
marine character.
41.0.2 Manage marine protected areas in accordance with
the provisions of the Act under which they are protected.
Implementation
41.1.1 Apply to establish a marine reserve representative of the
coastal character of northeastern Great Barrier Island.
41.1.2 Include the following sites for investigation, and where
appropriate implement protection:
Firth of Thames
Te Tokaroa (Meola) Reef
Waionui Inlet
Okahukura Peninsula coast
Northeast Motutapu Island
41.1.3 Seek to include within the adjacent reserves the foreshores
of the following:
Rangitoto Island,
Burgess Island,
Motutapu Island,
Browns Island,
Motuihe Island,
Tiritiri Matangi Island.
41.1.4 Consult with Iwi, the Auckland Marine Reserves Forum, territorial
local authorities, regional councils, the Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries, Ministry of Transport, Department of Survey and Land
Information, people likely to be affected such as those associated
with commercial and recreational fishing and the community generally,
to implement the establishment of the marine protected areas network.
41.1.5 Where existing marine protected areas, or possible future
locations, are associated with or adjacent to regional parks, continue
to liaise with the Auckland Regional Council to develop management
programmes which integrate with and are complementary to the Auckland
Regional Council’s park management.
41.1.6 Provide advice on policy and procedures in line with this
Strategy, to those organisations proposing marine reserves and other
marine protected areas.
41.1.7 Ensure that the local authorities in and adjoining the Conservancy
have regard to the contents of this Conservation Management Strategy
when preparing their planning documents under the Resource Management
Act.
41.1.8 Use opportunities to achieve marine protection through statutory
mechanisms other than those for which the Department is responsible
(see section on Statutory Planning page 319).
41.1.9 Support the establishment of marine protected areas, where
traditional Maori resource management practices are used (rahui),
and where statutory recognition of these practices is implemented,
eg. Mataitai areas, taiapure areas, closures under section 85 of
the Fisheries Act, and where the objectives include fishery resource
conservation.
41.1.10 Liaise with the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and
Ministry of Transport over the establishment of any particular marine
reserve, given the concurrence roles of the Ministers of Fisheries
and Transport.
41.1.11 Develop and implement compliance and law enforcement action
plans for the Cape Rodney-Okakari Point and Kermadec Islands Marine
Reserves as a matter of priority to ensure that the provisions of
the Marine Reserves Act as they relate to those reserves are adhered
to.
41.1.12 Develop and implement a compliance/ law enforcement action
plan for any future marine reserve or marine protected area.
41.1.13 Seek to ensure that activities within the Cape Rodney-Okakari
Point Marine Reserve and the adjacent land reserves are managed
so as to protect the marine reserve for scientific study and its
marine life and underwater scenery, while not detracting from visitors
enjoyment.
41.1.14 Consider entering into management agreements with appropriate
individuals/ agencies/ iwi regarding compliance and law enforcement
and in monitoring other marine protected areas.
41.1.15 Investigate the need for an advisory committee for the
management of any given marine protected area.
41.1.16 Process all applications for scientific study in accordance
with the relevant legislation and/ or Departmental guidelines.
41.1.17 Facilitate scientific monitoring of the conditions of certain
habitats and species within marine reserves and other marine protected
areas.
41.1.18 Co-ordinate with Northland and Waikato Conservancies over
the establishment of a marine protected area network.
41.1.19 Carry out publicity and education programmes to increase
public understanding, appreciation and enjoyment of marine protected
areas and their values, to assist compliance with regulations, and
to encourage community involvement in the management of marine protected
areas.
|